ABC News Blogs

Stenographer Error Gives Convicted Florida Murderer New Trial

What do you feel about this article?

A Florida man convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison will get a new trial, all thanks to a court stenographer who erased the entire transcript of his murder trial.

Randy Chaviano, 26, of Hialeah, Fla., was convicted by a jury in July 2009 of fatally shooting Charles Acosta, who came to his apartment to buy drugs.

Chaviano appealed his conviction to the Third District Court of Appeal in Miami.  When it was discovered that hardly any transcripts of his trial proceedings existed, the court last week threw out his conviction and life sentence, and ordered that he get an entirely new chance to go before jurors.

Any traces of Chaviano's trial all but disappeared from the Miami-Dade courthouse's records, officials say, because the court reporter for the case, Terlesa Cowart, failed to capture the trial on paper.

Cowart, a courts spokeswoman told the Miami Herald, put the trial transcript on an internal disc instead, and then erased the data from the stenography machine's memory disc.

She did back the disk up on her computer, but a virus on the computer later erased all of her notes.  All that remained was a transcript of one pretrial hearing and the trial's closing arguments.

"The rest is lost forever," Chaviano's attorney, Harvey Sepler, wrote in court documents.

For now, court stenographers in Miami-Dade are required to use machines that capture their work both on paper and the internal disc used by Cowart.

The county is currently pushing, against the wishes of stenographers, to replace the old human, paper and disk model with digital recorders instead.

The firm that employed Cowart at the time of the trial, Goldman Naccarato Patterson Vela & Associates Inc., told the Herald their employee had a history of not bringing enough of the paper stenographers use to chronicle the proceedings.

Cowart has since been fired from the firm.

The Miami-Dade State Attorney's office apologized for the error:  "The overturning of a murder conviction always means terrible pain for the victim's family and frustration for prosecutors and police officers.  Overturning a murder conviction because of a court reporter's problem creates a brand new level of pain and frustration," a spokesman told the Herald.

Also Read
 
 
Top Locations Monterey Park Denver Syracuse

779 comments

  • JONATHAN C  •  4 months ago
    so let me get this straight they have programs that can pull up files that one has deleted and deleted some more but they cant pull up the transcripts
    • Pete 4 months ago
      It depends how the files are deleted. If the operating system "marks them for deletion" then of course, the files are recoverable. If the data on the disk is actually overwritten, there's a marginal chance that there could be traces of the files that can be electromagnetically recovered. Is it a CD? Hard drive? Flash drive? All different storage mediums, different recovery prospects. But either way, this isn't CSI -- you can't just click "enhance" and have it automatically pull off all of the data in pristine format. At best you'd be looking at a "best guess" of what the data is -- one bit out of order and the recovered content could have mangled text.
    • Zeorymer 4 months ago
      You missed the most significant factor in this: a virus was blamed for erasing the information on the computer. With no details of what virus it was or what the virus actually did to the computer, it remains a guess as to the likeliness of information recovery, but it's definitely possible for a virus to make the files irretrievable.

      As for BillyJoeJimBob's opinion, I can't say I agree. Without details of what standard procedures for the firm's policies for information storage are, it's ridiculous to say that she should or shouldn't have been fired. It could be her fault, if she was not following protocol then yes, she definitely should have been fired. But if she was doing everything the way she was supposed to, then chances are it's the firm's fault. Also, it's not clear whether or not the computer that got the virus was her personal computer or the firm's computer that she used, and that, as well as how the virus got onto the computer, are also factors in whether or not she should have been fired.

      I will say, however, that I think he is totally wrong for blaming the judge. Anyone who knows anything about the legal system and court cases knows that even had the judge allowed the conviction to stand, it would have gone straight to the appellate courts, and they would almost definitely have overturned the conviction without prejudice; so by declaring a mistrial, all the judge was doing was saving the taxpayers some money on the cost of the appellate court hearing.
    • John Cippy 4 months ago
      the family who accused him must be eliminated..whats wrong with drugs any way???I say torture the family the way that poor man was put wrongly in jail
  • Deb  •  3 months ago
    wow, being a court reporter, I feel for her and the family that must endure another trial. I have lost and retrieved files and a virus erasing your entire computer is simply disturbing. It makes me think of the murderer on trial, you feel violated...as I worked in circuit court for ten years and reported countless murder trials. I know the reporter is heartbroken, both in her personal life and ethical professional life. God Bless everyone involved.
  • Droog  •  4 months ago
    Where's Dexter?
    • josh 4 months ago
      maybe Chaviano on his table right now because Dexter wanted him, hench the missing steno file! lol
    • aram 4 months ago
      That was literally my first thought when I read it was Miami! Nice.
    • mrSanders2 4 months ago
      Hench?
  • James  •  4 months ago
    WELCOME TO FLORIDA ....WHERE IF IT CAN GO WRONG 7 WAYS FROM SUNDAY ...IT PROBABLY WILL
    • Art T 4 months ago
      The only thing wrong with Florida is the yankees that moved here!
  • Michael  •  4 months ago
    So let's see, The Police can go get even a broken hard drives files and convict people on such files but cannot recollect erased ones. Guess what, The files are still there. Let a forensic computer person go and fetch the transcript
    • Pete 4 months ago
      They definitely did not think of this. And there's definitely no way that a file can ever be permanently, irretrievably erased. ( ... both of those statements were sarcastic, in case you can't tell.) But you took a Microsoft Excel course in high school so yeah you probably know what you're talking about.
    • Taylor G 4 months ago
      i think the issue is the steino go lazy, didn't take down any notes then when asked about it said the virus ate them
    • frank 4 months ago
      Norton Utilities discovered a long time ago how to "undelete" files, recover files that had been "erased", etc.. The 3rd District Court of Appeals in Miami apparently does not even know that there is a protocol for recovering such files. Can somebody @ Yahoo shoot them an email?
  • hydro1  •  4 months ago
    some one didn't try to get the data back. It's still there stupid.
    • Auntie Social 4 months ago
      I agree, that's why I don't think she DID a back-up. If it were there, you could get it back.
  • audra h  •  4 months ago
    it doesn't change the sentence and what the jurors decided. Sad that info was lost, but strange that it's getting overturned because of paperwork, not the trial itself.
  • Nathan  •  4 months ago
    i can recover files after they were deleted from the hard drive, send me the drive and ill rescue the transcripts.
  • mark  •  4 months ago
    being a steno is hard work like any job there are good one"s and bad one"s my wife is a steno and she works very hard to be as precise as she possible . It is hard to sit there and listen to evidence against a rapist or child rapist or murderer and it is not all done 9 to 5 she works into the early morning hours I pass her on my way to work at 4 am she is still in the kitchen working on transcripts for some felon to say she is wrong on what she transcribed.dont let one bad apple decide that all stenos are bad because they aren:t.
  • jc  •  4 months ago
    I understand it was the Stegnographer's fault for messing up, but why would the courts allow someone who was already convicted/sentenced for murder get a new trail soley because there was no transcript of his court hearing?
  • C  •  4 months ago
    If she has a history of not bringing the proper equipment then she should be more than just fired, she should be forced to pay for the expense of a new trial.
  • The Admiral  •  4 months ago
    Wow...our brilliant legal system at work again. Justice in this country really is blind.
  • Charlie  •  4 months ago
    Not the first time I've heard about this. The main problem is when an experienced (and sometimes not experienced) steno will start a business providing stenos or recorders to courts or hearings and not hiring quality workers. Sometimes their recordings are not checked for quality control and could sit in a file forever without being scrutinized for errors. Then some day, as in this story, someone needs the info and key data doesn't exist. Had some experienced with a case similar to this one. Also, saw one where there were so many redaction's, about the only info was the date (I admit this sounds a little exaggerated, hopefully you get the point).
  • kn t  •  4 months ago
    Any chance someone could erase Casey Anthony's transcripts so they could re-try her?
  • P. Velden  •  4 months ago
    I see some misconceptions here. I was a Court Reporter using Pitman Shorthand and no, I am not Methuselah's cousin. All my note books and court room recordings supporting my transcripts were kept at the court house when trials were finished. It is a Court Reporter's responsibility to take care of the materials properly. Ms. Cowart made an error and it is the accused' right to another trial when the evidence is destroyed.
  • Lucy  •  4 months ago
    I am thinking there is a little more to the story than they are sharing. I think I would check personal contact, bank accounts, etc. 99% of all deleted files can be recovered as long as the hard drive is not removed and destroyed. Even then, depending on the method used to destroy the drive, some techies can retrieve it. But then of course this Miami-Dade we are talking about.
  • M G  •  4 months ago
    Where's a Computer Forensics Scientist when you need one? Seems pretty simple to recover the transcripts; afterall, nothing is really ever deleted from your computer. Which is why we have the Computer Forensics Scientists profession. Something is amiss.
  • Louie Lou I  •  4 months ago
    FL has a lot of paper issues
  • OldBear  •  4 months ago
    I saved a college students bacon with Norton Disk Edit when the magnetic name tag 'erased' the floppy disk, So unless the whole disk was over written several times the files are there but several over writes is called a government erasure! Wonder why like budget it is gone!
  • Mary C  •  4 months ago
    Gotta love this State! How dumb is it when you don't create a back-up file.