CDC Panel Votes to Extend HPV Vaccine to Young Boys

All males starting at age 11 should receive the HPV vaccine Gardasil to protect themselves against sexually transmitted forms of human papillomavirus, the cause of most cervical and anal cancers as well as most mouth and throat cancers, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory committee voted today.

Thirteen members of the committee voted in favor of extending the HPV vaccine recommendation to young boys, and one member abstained. The recommendation now goes to the director of the CDC and the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for final approval.

The CDC already recommends routinely immunizing girls with a three-dose vaccine beginning at age 11 or 12, before they become sexually active, although they can be vaccinated as young as age 9. The agency previously issued a so-called permissive recommendation giving boys and young men from ages 9 through 26 the option of receiving the vaccine.

The prospect of requiring that preteen boys and girls get vaccinated against a sexually transmitted infection has drawn the sharpest outcry from some parents, who fear that vaccinating preteens might encourage promiscuous behavior. Vaccination policies also have become an issue in the 2012 presidential campaign, with several GOP candidates objecting to mandates for HPV vaccination.

Many infectious disease specialists welcome universal vaccination as a key tool in reducing the toll of preventable diseases.

"Vaccination is perhaps the greatest invention of medicine," said Dr. John Sinnott, director of the Division of Infectious Disease at the University of South Florida. "It is a tragedy that this vaccine has become politicized." But Dr. Lawrence Stanberry, chief pediatrician at New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, said parents support universal recommendations more recommendations targeting groups at higher risk.

"Recommending universal immunization for girls and making the recommendation for boys permissive sends parents mixed messages," Stanberry said. He offered a fairness argument for recommending vaccinations for both sexes. "Girls acquire the infection from boys and it seems appropriate, even fair, for boys to share responsibility for maximizing community [herd] immunity," he said.

Nearly a dozen experts contacted by ABC News cited "herd protection" from HPV-associated diseases in both women and men as a main reason they supported universal immunization.

William Muraskin, an urban studies professor at Queens College in New York, said it's hard to determine which men and women will benefit directly from vaccination. "The HPV vaccine if given before males become sexually active will also protect those who will become homosexual or bisexual," Muraskin said. Routine vaccination of all young men protects "an important subgroup that otherwise will be at significant risk but cannot be identified until it is too late."

The panel is expected to issue a policy statement on the importance of vaccinating men who have sex with men, because of the risk they could develop anal cancer from HPV.

Two HPV Vaccines On The Market Protect Against Multiple Strains

There are two HPV vaccines currently available, both of which protect against the two principal cancer-causing types of HPV, HPV 16 and HPV 18. By CDC estimates, the two strains cause 15,000 malignancies in women and 7,000 in men every year. The two strains account for an estimated 70 percent of cervical cancers, about 70 percent of vaginal cancers and most vulvar cancers. HPV 16 by itself causes 85 percent of anal cancers.

In addition to protecting against HPV 16 and HPV 18, Merck's Gardasil protects against two other disease-causing strains, HPV 6 and HPV 11, responsible for 90 percent of genital warts as well as cervical cell changes. GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix protects against HPV 16 and HPV 18, but also has been found to confer some protection against three other cancer-causing strains, HPV 31, HPV 33 and HPV 45.

Dr. Diane Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri-Kansas City called it "misguided to think that all boys will gain any health benefit from HPV vaccination."

She contended that "mass vaccination for the prevention of the other HPV-associated cancers puts large numbers of people at risk for harms from vaccination compared to both the personal and public health risk of anal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers."

In a background memo leading up to the vote, the CDC estimated that routinely vaccinating 11- and 12-year-old boys would likely be cost-effective. If 1 million 12-year-old boys were vaccinated, over the course of a lifetime, they would prevent 2,381 cases of mouth and throat cancer; 633 cases of anal cancer and 169 cases of penile cancer, assuming the vaccine was 75 percent effective against those conditions.

ABC News' Brian Hartman contributed to this story.

Also Read
 
 
Top Locations Nashville

758 comments

  • tokken88  •  6 months ago
    What you people don't realize is its the pharmacuticals lobbyist that are pushing the drugs. Merck & Co are the makers of Vioxx, you know the pain killer for arthritis that has a black box warning label. The company that was sued because they hid the fact that their medication caused heart attacks. I don't trust anything that comes from that company. I take what the cdc says with a grain of salt. This is about money bottom line. Think about it $350.00 per dosage 3 dosages per child. There is no studies showing what the side effects are. You are crazy if you think I'm going to allow my children to get that shot.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  6 months ago
    Give it to Rick Perry.
  • masterd  •  6 months ago
    I wonder how much the makers of it are paying to get this recommended !!!!!
    • julpaddy 6 months ago
      merck and co and yes they do in contributions
    • Pope Fred 6 months ago
      Ask Perry how much Merck gave him.
    • photo 6 months ago
      this is what it's all about
  • Destiny  •  6 months ago
    This vaccine does not cover all forms of this virus. In fact it doesnt even cover all the forms of the virus that cause cancer. This is something that you should talk to your doctor about. When I discussed it with my family doctor she said she didnt reccomend it, yet. When I discussed it with my gynecologist we decided that we should wait until more comprehensive reasearch could be done and the possibilty of a more all encompassing vaccine could be produced. Im lucky I have an infant so I have time. Also to say we have to take responsabilty for the cancer in our kids when not getting the shot is kinda funny. There is so much in our food, air, water, chemical products that we use everyday that is linked to cancer it would be impossible not to be at fault for our childrens possible some day cancer. You dont want your kids to get cancer in the future dont have kids. There is no cure for cancer only preventive meassures, and those are and should always be a matter of choice. Heres the CDC's link that states this vaccine does not cover all forms of the cancer causing virus. There is surely pros to it but like I said when I tallked about to my health care providers the were enough cons to hold off on saying yes to it just yet.
    http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-vaccine-young-women.htm
    • Hedgehog 6 months ago
      Your post makes no sense. If you have an infant, neither you nor your infant are eligible for the shot.
    • The Eye of Reason 6 months ago
      This vaccine only covers two strains, but they are the strains of HPV that are responsible for most cervical cancers and most of the head and neck cancers men get.
    • Destiny 6 months ago
      No we are not eligable for the shot but it doesnt mean I cant talk to my heath care providers about it. My spouse has a form of HPV so I got very educated about it and aware of what was involved with the virus and the vaccine. Just because I'm not faced with a choice right now does not mean I cant be informed about it.
  • Stephen S  •  6 months ago
    26 deaths blamed on Gardasil since 9-10. Keep your poison to yourself CDC. We don't believe your propaganda.
    • Hedgehog 6 months ago
      Show me the study. There are ZERO deaths blamed on Gardasil since it was introduced.
  • Blitz  •  6 months ago
    who do you think gives millions to the FDA to get these approvals?
    • Greg* 6 months ago
      the drug company !
  • not-that-stupid  •  6 months ago
    [herd]? Neither I, nor my children are part of a herd. We are not cattle, we are humans. I WILL not allow my children to take this until they are 18 years old, then it is their decision. Now, all of the ones stating that my children will endanger your cattle, if your cattle are vaccinated, then my children are no threat to yours. It is people who are under 30 that are supporting this, typical of the uneducated youth with limited to no real life experience with NGO's, Big Pharma, The UN (who owns the CDC) and politicians.

    I bet you any amount of money that these "doctors and scientist" are all getting paid by big pharma.

    No wonder this country is screwed. Very few even have half a brain left and are not using that half.
    • A Yahoo! User 6 months ago
      Thier education was an indoctrination. They have all been socially engineered as they are bombarded on all fronts and are now incapable of critical thinking. Sheep.
  • Sandy  •  6 months ago
    HPV is not necessarily a sexually transmitted disease. The virus is found in the umbilical cord, placenta and in infants. Is the pressure to inject young girls and boys a trick by vaccine promoters to sell the vaccine to a very large group of the population as quickly as possible? It has been shown that there is a far higher number of serious adverse events with this vaccine than with others.
    It is extremely worrying that clinical trials reveal that the risk of cervical cancer is increased 44.6% in girls who get vaccinated if they are previously exposed to HPV. Read that sentence again!
  • Tantillo Space  •  6 months ago
    Why of course! The government is not happy with just poisoning young girls! They figured why not include young males in their depopulation plans!
  • Basketball-Ublandabar  •  6 months ago
    BIG BROTHER STRIKES AGAIN
  • Bob  •  6 months ago
    There is no concrete proof that Gardisil prevents anything. I read up on the study when I was in nursing school and the study was done by Merck.
    The results were not conclusive nor were tehy performed by an independant agency. For all they know it si nothing more than a placebo.
    Again big money and big government working together to 'HELP YOU". lol
  • Lawrence N  •  6 months ago
    Shills for BIG PHARMA. BAD, BAD, BAD!
  • Karloff  •  6 months ago
    More Korporate Kontrolled Killing !
  • deborah  •  6 months ago
    No. It is not possible to get HPV or any disease caused by HPV from the vaccination. Thatโ€™s because there is no live virus in the vaccine.

    Instead, the vaccination contains a protein that helps the bodyโ€™s immune system produce antibodies against HPVโ€”without causing an infection.
  • stop the brain washing  •  6 months ago
    In California, Pharma just had a bill passed that they can inject in kids 12 an above without parents consent. Jerry Brown had a call to vote no. Of course the line was always busy and you couldn't vote no. Parents rights are slowly being taken away and given to big pharma companies. So sick!!!! How can we name the actual humans who push for this. Don't let them hide behind the corporate logo. Make them personally accountable.
  • Totemkomph  •  6 months ago
    Anyone heard of the Tuskegee experiments done on blacks with syphilis disguised as vaccines? Brought to you by the WHO.
  • Eli  •  6 months ago
    Spain, India, France and a number of other countries have banned Gardasil and advertisement of Gardasil because of the high number of adverse reactions from the vaccine.
  • Avid Reader  •  6 months ago
    CDC = Corporate Drug Center
  • LibertyLover  •  6 months ago
    Look up Dr. Ten Penny and Natural News.

    Never ever allow anyone to tell you what you can and can't put into your own body or that of your children. Your children belong to you not to the government!
  • kim v  •  6 months ago
    Saying the vaccine will encourage promiscuous behaviour is like saying a Tetanus shot will encourage all of us to wantonly cut ourselves with rusty cans. It's not a birth control shot, after all.