Glimmer of Hope in Texas Redistricting Battle Could Preserve April Primary

There was a glimmer of hope today for resolution in the long and tangled battle over Texas' redistricting maps, when state Attorney General Greg Abbott and members of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund agreed to a set of interim Congressional maps.

The rare moment of consensus between the state and the Latino leadership organizations comes just in time to possibly preserve the Lone Star state's April primary date, which was originally scheduled for Super Tuesday on March 6 but was  moved back a month because of the redistricting fight.

As the second largest state, Texas is fighting to preserve its relevance in a GOP primary race that is beginning to be dominated by Mitt Romney. And while Texas pushes to stay in heat of the battle, so too is GOP candidate Newt Gingrich.

Gingrich vowed Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation" that his campaign would push on through Super Tuesday and said that after Texas voters take to the polls, his goal is to be "about tied in delegates" with Romney.

But the Texas redistricting battle is far from over and thus the state's primary date is far from certain. Some minority groups still oppose the state's newest compromise maps and the lingering disagreements may force the Texas primary into late May or June.

MALDEF, which represents Texas' Latino leadership organizations in the redistricting lawsuit, issued a statement Monday saying it was "amenable" to the new maps and would not challenge them.

"While neither plan is perfect, the Task Force feels it is time to move forward with Texas primaries and let the voters decide the outcome under a legally valid map that protects all existing minority opportunity districts… complies with the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution," the statement said.

But Trey Martinez Fischer, chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, which represents Texas' Latino elected officials, said the newest maps were "are a beginning point, not an end."

"The Attorney General presents an illusion of an inclusive map; the reality is that it falls short of recognizing minority growth in Texas," Martinez Fischer said in a statement posted to the group's Facebook page. "While all the parties support a primary as soon as possible, we want to ensure that Texans have fair and legal redistricting maps."

Abbott said in a statement today that the newest maps "incorporate reasonable requests" from opposing parties "without compromising the will of the Texas Legislature" and make changes "only where necessary" to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling.

The original maps, drawn by the Republican-controlled state legislature last summer, were immediately challenged by a cohort of Latino advocacy groups which claimed the maps illegally diluted Hispanics' voting power.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in January that the Legislature's maps violated the Voting Rights Act and sent the maps back to the San Antonio court where a compromise is being hammered out.

Texas gained four new Congressional seats following the 2010 Census - more than any other state - in large part because of the state's booming Hispanic population, which accounted for 65 percent of Texas' population growth over the past decade.

The San Antonio court will hear an additional round of arguments on the compromise proposals Feb. 15. If no consensus is reached then, the Texas primary will again be delayed.

Also Read
 

23 comments

  • Bob  •  Osage Beach, Missouri  •  3 months ago
    ALERT: Every American voter MUST please STAND UP and fight against Republican redistricting because they are doing it in every State to favor the Republicans. Additionally, we all must fight back on REPUBLICON VOTER SUPPRESSION. What nerve the GOP/TEA PARTY HAS!!!
  • Kevin  •  3 months ago
    Tell me it ain't so, Republicans trying to disenfranchise a minority group in redistricting! Like we didn't know that they would try to do just that!
  • mcgee  •  Modesto, California  •  3 months ago
    Let them eat tacos!
  • Geezer68  •  Miami, Florida  •  3 months ago
    Remember the Texas legislators hiding on the roof of the Capitol Bulding and running off to Oklahoma trying to show how the state was being ripped off by the GOP. Hell Tom Delay was convicted over it. He's still using loopholes to stay out of prison.Its about time Texas got with the program. We are named the United States
  • Blue Planet  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    Texas Republicans to Hispanic voters: Yes, we think you are that stupid.
  • Frank Hammer  •  3 months ago
    I don't see where this really effects the primary-since it is Republican. They should just have their primary on Super Tuesday. The issue is in the general election in November.
  • Blue Planet  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
    Texas Republicans to electorate: Yes, we do think you are that stupid.
  • Retired SFC  •  3 months ago
    the Supreme Court said the Legislature's maps violated the Voting Rights Act and Greg Abbott use tax dollars to fight this. then he made a deal to keep some of the good old boys in office.
    • Martin 3 months ago
      Actually the article got that bit of information wrong. It said the San Antonio Court should have used the Legislature's map as a basis for a few minor changes. It also said drawing a new map and throwing out the Legislatures map was unconstitutional courts are not allowed to legislate from the bench.
  • Retired SFC  •  3 months ago
    3 million new Latinos and greg abbott said they were all republicans, hahaha.
    • Martin 3 months ago
      3 million new Latinos in Texas and only 10% are eligible to vote. Foriegn Nationals don't get representation in our nation's House of representatives or state Congressional districts. The big change since the last Census is not in legal hispanics it was in people moving here from other states to take jobs. These are the people that should get the representation in our new districts.
    • mcgee 3 months ago
      The real gripe is the GOP Reps don't want to represent the stronger Latino community because they are not sure on how to handle it and or it may not have the same financial climate they are accustomed to. AKA; the cookie jar isn't as full.
    • Retired SFC 3 months ago
      Hey martin, if only 10% is eligible, why did texas get four more congressional seats?
  • -Artful Codger  •  3 months ago
    Sleazy GOP politics...Anyone surprised by this? If you don't want a district to vote a democratic ticket, just change the map so that likely dem. voters are suddenly the minority! It smacks of days gone by, when blacks were denied the vote by force of arms.
    • P S 3 months ago
      You stinking liberal.......you don't think the liberal Dumbocrats do the same kind crap? Guess again #$%$
    • M. L. 3 months ago
      This sort of district boundary game playing is the source of the term "Gerrymandering" in the 19th century. Both parties have played the game for decades and in every state. It was one of the prime factors in the creation of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Here, apparently the Taxas Republicans are taking it to a extreme. The state counted something like 3 to 4 million new residents, 65% of which were hispanic and presumably inclined to vote for democrats. So the legislature simply redrew the district boundaries to minimize their influence and maintain the white republican majorities in the state legislature. That's exactly what the VRA was intened to prevent or at least minimize. Texas didn't even try to sugar coat it and since they were already under sanction by the Justice Dept. they got caught. Now they're trying to figure out how to remove their hand from the proverbial cookie jar without losing too many fingers.
  • cheffy chef  •  3 months ago
    So Hispainics, Asians, democrats of all shaped and sizes, I think the only thing to do is move into rich white neighborhoods. I bit of Latin flair or Asian flair may help them open their eyes. All democrats in Texas should move in and vote into each district. That'll show um!
  • Vivian  •  3 months ago
    I support allowing a computer to draw district lines, just so it's programmed to make districts that are as close as possible to equal populations (regardless of race), approximately rectangular in shape (no gerrymandering), and generally based on natural dividing points like highways and rivers. In other words, the way a reasonable person would draw them if they had no political agenda to try to favor this group or that.
  • LadyGT350  •  3 months ago
    Dang special interest groups always want to bend the rules and stick it to anyone not of their race, sexual orientation, or what ever pain the #$%$ group they are from. Screw them and their "I'm better than you, have more rights than you, I'm special" attitudes. Suck it up sweethearts, follow the rules and quit wasting taxpayer's dollars with our pansy#$%$, little crybaby whining!
  • Robert  •  3 months ago
    Unfortunately the 2010 Census counted heads not legal voters. Political groups with less than a majority of voters are controlling the discussion because the census counted people in households whether legally in the US or not. Future census polls should differentiate between illegal persons and legal residents to be fair to all if votes are to be of any importance.
  • Preybrother  •  Richardson, Texas  •  3 months ago
    We're talking about hundreds of thousands of illegals here people! If Texas can gain more seats by an influx of illegal latinos, there is something wrong with the system.
    • Mr. Z 3 months ago
      They're only counting the legal citizens for redistricting. Have you ever heard that Texas used to be part of Mexico? Some of those hispanic citizens that you think you're better than have ancestors that have been here longer than yours.
      Now put the wheels back on your "house" and go back to Missisippi so you can keep fighting the Civil War with your cousins.
    • jon 3 months ago
      For years Democrats counted on "dead" people voting, now they have to use "illegals' to help win elections.
    • -Artful Codger 3 months ago
      I keep telling you right-wing-nuts that ILLEGALS CAN'T VOTE, but Rush Limpballs said they can, so.....
  • jon  •  Pleasanton, California  •  3 months ago
    When Democrats controlled Texas, they drew the lines the way they wanted. Today they don't want the same rules.
    • Liz Padilla 3 months ago
      The original maps didn't comply with the law. You're an idjit.
    • Jim 3 months ago
      You have no clue. Keep your nose in your own state.
    • LJA 3 months ago
      Those Democrats are now Republicans. same people (1970's--forward) Used to confuse me no end when I visited relatives how that change happened.,
  • P S  •  3 months ago
    My only question is; how do they know that hispanics and illegals made up 65% of the growth?
  • Whistle Punk  •  Merlin, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    Why would MALDEF have anything to say about it?
  • weeniedawg  •  Santa Rosa Beach, Florida  •  3 months ago
    The far left won't be satisfied until illegal aliens and other non qualified people are allowed to vote. Where I live I'm required to have a photo ID and my information is checked when I sign in at the polls. What's the problem there? Any American citizen can get a photo ID.
  • JohnG  •  Elyria, Ohio  •  3 months ago
    Well, let's just make this really clear so even a Texas Tea Party Redneck can understand....if all those new Texans are illegals....then you should give up those 4 new congressional seats...leave the map as it was....really simple answer for those with simple minds....the problem is they think they can keep the seats and ignore the people responsible for the new seats. Supreme Court...... to Texas ....."Gotcha"