Global Warming: Like 'Weather on Steroids'

Are we "doping" our atmosphere?

What's going on with these record warm temperatures… extreme snowfall… even January tornadoes?

Is climate change the cause? Or more appropriately, what impact is climate change having on our weather?

To help answer those questions, a group of researchers has just released a new online guide for understanding the links between more extreme weather and a warming planet.

Is global warming throwing our weather out of whack? Scientists tell us there's no easy, blanket answer. The bottom line is that the evidence can be strong or weak, depending on the type of weather. That, admit researchers, can be confusing to anyone looking for a clear answer.

"This is a very complicated subject," said David Hosansky, spokesman for the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, which produced the report and operates the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. "We were convinced that these different messages could confuse the public and leave the people thinking that we just can't connect the dots. And in fact, a lot of the dots are being connected."

To help connect those dots, the center created a new webpage called "Weather on Steroids." (The banner image on the website even features a syringe injecting Planet Earth with an unknown substance.) They've even taken a shot at an animated analogy, comparing our weather to a baseball player on steroids.

"We wanted to reach out to the public and present it in a way that could resonate widely," Hosansky said.

When it comes to weather, for example, researchers say they have greater confidence that heat waves, torrential downpours and "Snowmageddon"-type storms are becoming more extreme as humans pump more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. (They point out that since since greenhouse gases are a relatively small part of the atmosphere, a small increase created by human beings can make a significant difference.) There is less confidence, however, that weather phenomena like hurricanes, tornadoes and El Nino/La Nina conditions are being affected in measurable ways.

"Although the number of observed U.S. tornadoes has more than doubled since the 1950s, as more spotters and chasers watch the skies, there has been no significant trend in the strongest twisters," the report says.

You can read the entire "spectrum of confidence" and the supporting evidence here.

At a time when a substantial portion of the public and even some local TV meteorologists don't believe human activity is affecting the climate, the scientists say their report draws on the latest research to help clear the air.

"We wanted to give a clear view of the science to decision makers, the media, and members of the public," Hosansky said. "And show where the science is and where the science is going."

The report comes as the National Oceanic and Atmosheric Administration, or NOAA, releases the latest "State of the Climate" report. Among the findings:

In January, the average contiguous U.S. temperature was 5.5 degrees F above the long-term average. The first two months of the winter season were much warmer than average.

"A total of twenty-two states from Montana to Maine had December-January temperatures ranking among their ten warmest," NOAA reported.

Only Florida and Washington had near-average temperatures last month, and no state saw temperatures cooler than average. Every other state had above-average temperatures in January.

Many Northern Plains cities broke all-time high-temperature records in January, including Minot, N.D. The city hit 61 degrees F on Jan. 5, busting the previous record of 59 degrees set in 1906.

Alaska, on the other hand, saw some of the coldest temperatures on record in January, including Nome at -16.6 degrees F and Bettles at -35.5 degrees F.

Also Read
 
  • larry  •  3 months ago
    Is not Europe 5.5 degrees cooler than normal this year ? Why leave that out of conversation ??!
    • gadfly05 3 months ago
      Because that's a real inconvenient truth.
  • Paul  •  Providence, Rhode Island  •  3 months ago
    By the way, can someone tell me what the Earth's temperature is SUPPOSED to be?!
    • Demhole 3 months ago
      Very astute statement my friend.
    • nunya 3 months ago
      42
    • Bennett 3 months ago
      Yes. According to everything we know about geology and the glaciation cycle, the atmosphere should be slowly cooling. The fact that it is rapidly warming cannot be ascribed to natural causes.
  • Headcons  •  Maple Grove, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
    OK, First off, what caused the very simular winter in 1942, and few other winters very simular inbetween? Seems to me we had very limited effect from pollution in 1942. I did some research as my father in law remembers pouring concrete almost that whole winter here in Minnesota, and read articles where people who usually harveste ice off the lakes for the ice houses had trouble getting on the lakes. And why do they not mention the report I saw about a month ago, stating that the SUN has been overly active the last couple of years, throwing much more radiation clouds over our planet? They showed on sun spur that arched over 800,000 miles. People, epecially the Gore group, that there are MANY things that influence our weather on earth.
  • flipacoin  •  3 months ago
    ...no state saw cooler than average temperature in January...but ALASKA had record cold temperatures in January. Is Alaska a state? Then you have all of Canada with record cold because of being north of a jet stream. If you have record high temperatures south of a jet stream and record low temperatures north of the jet streams and put the two temperature reading together, what do you have? A normal average....except to environmentalist...you have global warming causing the record cold and global warming is causing the record high temperatures at the same time. Aren't environ-'mental'-ist special? They have both sides of the coin. Heads they win, tails we lose on global economic domination with global warming as the excuse for these eco-fascist.
    • StevenP 3 months ago
      The contiguous states do not include Alaska and Hawaii. Alaska was mentioned in the last sentence 'On the other hand' to emphasize the disparity that weather on steroids is causing.
    • StevenP 3 months ago
      In the really long term sense as the Earth heats up we'll have more volcanoes which will spew lots of ash into the atmosphere. That will cause global cooling. This has been going on for millions of years and is all part of the Earths climate cycle. People, scientists and laymen alike, need to take a chill pill. Pun intended!
  • Hajimullah JP-ullah  •  3 months ago
    I have an idea. Instead of pumping time and money into arguing this useless #$%$ on which no one agrees and against which we can do very little in real terms, how about we get together and go after the Pacific Garbage patch - a floating island of trash the size of Texas - and clean up our oceans. You know, something not politically charged and actually do-able.
    • Claude 3 months ago
      Best idea I have ever heard. I saw that island from 30,000 ft up, it looks disgusting!!
    • Cybernaut 3 months ago
      while you are not going to sway me on a made-up climate change falsehood, I do like the idea of cleaning up that crap pile in the ocean that has been created by other countries. How to pay for it? raise import tarriffs on the countries that have garbage in that pile, until the cleanup is paid for.
    • Harmegido 3 months ago
      not a bad idea
  • Rich H  •  Woodburn, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    This brought to you by the people that wouldn't have a job if you didn't believe in their global warming theory.
  • PardonMyFrench  •  Zurich, Switzerland  •  3 months ago
    Obviously a well balanced look at the subject. "Weather on Steroids" screams objectivity. It's also funny how they decided to use US statistics this winter. By the same logic we are entering a min-ice age over here in Europe. Yahoo news.....do you want to see your stock price go up? Be a little more objective. Maybe the new board members coming can do some good. Give us the facts on both sides of a discussion.
    • The Great One 3 months ago
      Hey PardonMyFrench, did you flunk out of science classes? It doesn't take much logic to figure out what is going on. Think about it. More evaporation off of the oceans creates more clouds. The clouds go over land and guess what it condenses and falls because clouds are white which guess what, reflect the sunlight back into space, thus the moisture falls. And it is usually in large quantities now. All you flat earther's need to go back to school. Even the renowned physicist at UC Berkeley finally came around after analyzing the data. (do a search if you can handle that). He was being funded by the Koch brothers who have a lot of mining and petroleum interests. Wake up and quit being so stupid!
    • PardonMyFrench 3 months ago
      Well, that was objective. One can always tell when you get to someone. The name calling starts etc. Couldn't you have just stuck to the facts? Here's what I tell people. Look at all of the facts and have a debate leaving the name calling out of it. Everyone should of course respect the earth we live on. If I wrote an article with a similar slant that implied the earth was actually cooling you probably would have the same response I did. My concern comes from governmental responses. Europe has imposed an emissions tax on all airlines. Okay, now what? It seems to most normal people that cash strapped governments are merely trying to collect more money in any form they can. Will this tax truly help alleviate global warming? If you respond with facts in a respectable form it would be appreciated. It's either happening or it's not. We're either causing it or we're not. I merely pointed out that Yahoo News seems to have more and more articles that are one sided.
  • Bill  •  3 months ago
    I find it fascinating that the people with the strongest opinion on this subject are also the same people who have the poorest understanding of this subject.
  • RICHARD_ABC  •  3 months ago
    The climate will change as it always did with or without humans. The only way "scientists" can present credible evidence of anthropogenic events if they can prove the difference between climate change with and without humans. So far no "leading scientists" have published in "peer-reviewed journals" what the baseline would be without human activities. Therefore, the "leading scientists" have no standing in the discussion more than anyone with common sense.
  • NotThisUHaul  •  3 months ago
    Maybe Al Gore can tell the hundreds of Europeans who have frozen to death this year that they should buy carbon credits to stave off global warming.
  • Jason  •  3 months ago
    hoax
  • Insertnamehere  •  3 months ago
    Every time the Global Warming #$%$ is brought up I have to post this! NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed. Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models. “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.” In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted. The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate.
  • Cheeseburger  •  3 months ago
    Even if global warming isn't happening. Why would any correct thinking person want to pollute the planet we all live in?
  • jim k  •  Esparto, California  •  3 months ago
    Too much rain global warming. Not enough rain global warming. Too much snow global warming. Too many hurricanes global warming. Heck, I've even heard earthquakes are caused by it.
    Whatever you need it to be to suit your agenda. How convenient.
  • SAM D  •  3 months ago
    I believe in climate change........ it changes every day.
  • Joaquin  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Global Warming: A scam on steroids.
  • cape cod gene  •  3 months ago
    PROOF of global warming- changed temperature readings, falsified data, omission of information, smear campaigns, shredded documents yup, there you have it -global warming in spades.
  • Desmond Twotwo  •  Springfield, Missouri  •  3 months ago
    What arouses anger in a lot of people is the fact that some people – including some so called scientists – are using global warming as some kind of perverted political tool. What could possibly be more idiotic than pointing your finger at people whose politics offend you and saying that they are screwing up the weather? It's primitive. It's medieval. It's witch doctor stuff. At least the ideological fanatics seem to be backing away from that mode of operation.
  • Joseph  •  Oakland, New Jersey  •  3 months ago
    Politics and science don't mix.
  • A Yahoo! User  •  3 months ago
    Why don't we focus on the continual pollution of our water sources? That will kill us long before 1º of average warmer weather over a hundred year period will. Finding mercury and other industrial pollution in remote arctic water is a real immediate concern. Or like someone else said remove the garbage island in the Pacific. Focus energy real problems that we can fix, not theoretical problems where solutions can't exist.