Honeymoon Murder Trial Charges Dismissed By Judge

The judge presiding over the so-called honeymoon killer trial dismissed murder charges against Gabe Watson after the prosecution completed its case today.

The charges were dismissed before the defense presented a single witness.

Watson, 34, was charged with killing Tina Watson in 2003 during an Australian honeymoon 11 days after they were married.

Prosecutors had claimed that Watson had shut off his wife's air supply while scuba diving off of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, then turned the air back on after she had died. The motive, prosecutors claimed, was to collect on her life insurance and her possessions.

The prosecution rested its case today after two weeks of testimony . Defense lawyer Brett Bloomstom immediately made a motion to dismiss the case for lack of evidence, and Judge Tommy Nail agreed that the prosecution had failed to prove that Watson had killed his wife.

Watson's dad, Dave Watson, hugged his son after the judge dismissed the case and was conciliatory to Tina's family.

"I am sorry for the Thomas' family loss. I hope Gabe and our family can now move forward with our lives," Dave Watson said.

Charges in Honeymoon Murder Trial Tossed By Judge

Watson's lawyer Brett Bloomstom said his client "hopes this will be the end of this case and that it will be put behind them."

Tina Watson's father, Tommy Thomas, had testified emotionally earlier in the day said he was "disappointed" that the case never reached a jury. Thomas said he felt that more consideration was given for accused than his daughter.

Prosecutor Don Valeska said there is no appeal of the judge's ruling.

"Judge Nail did what he thinks is right. I strongly disagree with him. I'm extremely stunned and at a loss for words," Valeska said.

Gabe Watson claims his wife panicked and when he went to help her, she accidentally knocked his mask and regulator off. By the time he recovered, she had drifted out of his reach.

Watson had pleaded guilty to negligent manslaughter in Australia for failing to save her and spent 18 months in prison. Alabama tried him for murder, claiming the alleged crime was plotted in the U.S.

If convicted, Watson could have been sentenced to life in prison.

The judge has been growing publicly skeptical of the prosecution's case in recent days. Earlier today he refused to admit as evidence a statement by Tina Watson's father who claimed that his daughter came to him shortly before the wedding to say that Gabe Watson asked her to increase her insurance to $130,000. The father told her "not to worry about it" now, but tell Gabe Watson it had been increased.

The judge ruled the statement inadmissible and hearsay.

And on Tuesday Nail sent the jury out of the courtroom and scoffed at prosecutor Don Valeska's suggestions that Gabe Watson took back his wife's engagement ring before she was buried as evidence of his greed.

"You mean to tell me that [Gabe Watson] bought the engagement ring, married her, he and his family paid for a wedding, he planned and paid for a honeymoon halfway around the world, all so he could kill her to get an engagement ring he bought in the first place?" the judge asked.

The prosecution also suffered a blow earlier today when Bloomstom asked Tommy Thomas, Tina Watson's father, "Do you know Tina's estate valued was $3,000 at time of her death?"

"No," replied Thomas.

"Are you aware Tina had $24,000 in debt?" Bloomstom asked.

"No," the father replied.

Bloomstom also asked Thomas if he collected his daughter's life insurance, and Thomas admitted that he did.

Watson has since remarried and his wife sat stoically through the trial.

Also Read
 
  • Good American  •  2 months ago
    Have been diving since 1972 with my wife..She is a good diver but has twice panicked, once almost killing me and herself and the last time she dove was pulled back on the boat by one of the lead divers and hasn't got back in the water with gear on in 5 years.................Panick is overwhelming for some and can happen to people who have been diving many years and with the number of rude divers and one day wonders out there that are responsible for many of accidents underwater because it all about them,spliting dive buddys up in Caves or deep dives can be a real killer. In Cozumel one year my wife entered a cave and a old lawyer and his young arm candy shot in between my wife and I, I had to wait to swim around the two all the while I could see in my wifes eyes things wheren't going well, The two had no clue what they had done was wrong and unsafe and might I add didn't care.........
    • Timothy Sampson 2 months ago
      Of course accidents happen....but then again you didn't just leave your wife to die while you swam to the surface.
    • DiStUrBeD Grrrrl 2 months ago
      Agreed T.S. :)
  • m17  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  2 months ago
    It's sad for her family that she is gone, but from the begining this case seemed far fetched and ridiculous and a family it seems let their grief and unwillingness to accept that it was just a tragic accident took it way too far. Finally a judge with the sense to bring the case to it's logical conclusion.
    • SusanB 2 months ago
      I don't know what happened and I know tragic accidents happen and this sounds like one of them, but to suspect him of foul play is not really ridiculous and far fetched. He had been found guilty of negligence and failing to act appropriately. No evidence that it was deliberate, but not a crazy notion, either. What if her dad was telling the truth (why would he lie? why would a family want to believe it was murder if there was no reason?) about his asking his wife to increase the life insurance policy and put it in his name? Would you feel differently about it?
    • DiStUrBeD Grrrrl 2 months ago
      Agree S.B., Unfortunately, I have found some people (on these comment forums, particularly) need to ACTUALLY LISTEN TO THE FACTS before running to post their 'uninformed' comment on the computer!!! He is guilty of something in the court system. Negligence of some type for sure! There was PLENTY of evidence, the Judge wouldn't let any evidence admitted into the courtroom! Then claimed, there was no evidence...
  • Jackie  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  2 months ago
    That can't look good on the prosecuting lawyer's resume.
    • TS 2 months ago
      And let's be honest, the prosecutor's resume is the whole reason this ever went to trail here to begin with!!
    • Rollo18754 2 months ago
      The main prosecutor is known for being grandiose and making outlandish claims. In short, he's a clown.
    • catspaw 2 months ago
      I am glad the judge cancelled the clowns act
  • Jason U  •  2 months ago
    He may or may not have done it. But there was a complete lack of evidence and the judge was following the rule of law.
    • Red_Eyed_Rat 2 months ago
      Well said. The system is not perfect, but it is what it is.
    • HurleyJ 2 months ago
      I couldn't agree more... Too bad people don't have this view of the Casey Anthony verdict as well... Do I "feel" she was guilty, you bet... Was there evidence??? Not enough for 12 jurors to unanimously convict...
    • Wattsaholics 2 months ago
      yeah hurley, o.j. as well huh???...u idiot!!!
  • Notorious  •  2 months ago
    Get mad at the Prosecution, not the system itself. Do yourselves a favor and read the article from yesterday when the Judge called out the Prosecutor for his lack of evidence and insane motive. The judge had no choice but to throw the case out based on the incompetent and moronic Prosecutor. I would have thrown it out to based on what was presented at trial.
    • LazyTheKid 2 months ago
      I'm not so sure the prosecutor was "incompetent" or "moronic". The prosecutor was simply doing his job as directed by the DA. However, the guy didn't actually murder his wife and no motive is established. Not sure why the DA thought this case had any probable cause...the guy should sue for malicious prosecution.
    • John 2 months ago
      Being on the accused side of a murder trial myself, I can tell you that Prosecutors do this all the time. They try cases where there's no way to prove what happened, let alone who did it. So they just assume that the one closest to them at the time did it. It's sickening to watch and even more sickening to go through. Sadly, most jurers will side with the prosecutor in cases where there's really no evidence. They assume that since they were charged and tried, they must have done it. This is why so many innocent are in prisons now.
    • Mandy 2 months ago
      And the fact is, even if you are found innocent your life is ruined, legal fees alone will cost more than a house. Let alone the stigma.
  • David  •  2 months ago
    Sounds to me that the father had alot more to gain then the husband. You don't suppose the death was really accidental do you? The husband ended up with $24,000 of his wife's debt and the father ended up $130,000 richer.
  • Marco  •  St Cloud, Minnesota  •  2 months ago
    Wonder what Nancy Grace is going to Label him. and how long will she run her stupid mouth.
  • neal  •  Greensboro, North Carolina  •  2 months ago
    lets see , he lived with her for 10 years , paid for a wedding and expensive vacation for possessions and the engagement ring he bought it . Very poor police and prosecutor work before going to trial , even if more evidence is found he can't be tried again
  • Hawk  •  2 months ago
    Gabe Watson paid thousands of dollars to retain a lawyer to represent him. The prosecution had nothing of real evidence to even prove the possibility of a crime committedโ€ฆjust a lofty speculation with a dreamed up scenario. The REAL INJUSTICE NOW is that Gabe has no way to recover the money for a lawyer he should have never had to hire. It is time they start putting the monkey on the backs of the DA's office. If they are willing to put a person through this financial and emotional trauma and a judge dismisses or a jury acquits unanimously...then the State pays back the defendant and the prosecutor gets a strike in their record. After so many strikes, they are fired and banned from ever practicing law again. It is time people open their eyes and see the ugly monster behind the veil of lies we call our judicial system. Also, any prosecutor that withholds, tampers, or falsifies evidence just to get a winโ€ฆgoes straight to prison.
  • WTF  •  2 months ago
    I love when the public, based on no fact, think they know more than the judge who sat through all that SWORN TESTIMONY.

    Remember that innocent until proven guilty stuff?
  • AstroBoy  •  2 months ago
    First honest Judge. If the trial was in Illinois they would be already preparing the electric chair. Just look up the Winger case. Crooked cops, crooked Judge, crooked Prosecutors. Then 20/20 and media spins and edits to make them look like heroes. Didn't work this time.
  • jeff  •  2 months ago
    There are a lot of interesting comments written but the fact is the prostituting attorney tried to get away with essentially what is double jeopardy. This man pleaded to and served time already for manslaughter in Australia but the prostituting attorney in Alabama wanted him to remain in prison so he trumped up these charges without and proof whatsoever. His entire case was built on conjecture, unproved theories, and his own biased dislike for someone he never met before having him brought up on those ridiculous charges.
  • Mark  •  Fresno, California  •  2 months ago
    What a joke of a prosecution! They claim his motive was to collect the life insurance money but he wasn't even named as the beneficiary.
  • Edward  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  2 months ago
    Just tell me one thing....where do I go to watch Nancy Grace turn blue and pitch an embolism?
  • Desert Rat  •  2 months ago
    "You mean to tell me that [Gabe Watson] bought the engagement ring, married her, he and his family paid for a wedding, he planned and paid for a honeymoon halfway around the world, all so he could kill her to get an engagement ring he bought in the first place?" the judge asked.

    A big WOOT for common sense. Hopefully they'll leave this guy alone and give him his life back.
  • Ea  •  2 months ago
    In the real world you need concrete evidence. The prosecution here had none what so ever.
    Yet somehow some of you know he's guilty. How is that? Is it because he was prosecuted and the government would never prosecute an innocent man or is it because he is a man and a woman can't drown accidently? What exactly proves to you he's a murderer? What tells you he plotted a murder after spending for the wedding, ring and a honeymoon trip that cost thousands of dollars. She was in debt for $24,000 and had a net worth of $3,000.
    He pleaded guilty to negligent manslaughter in Australia for failing to save her but there was no proof that she would have survived had he brought her to the surface. He may be an self preserving chithead for not bringing her up but that doesn't mean he plotted to kill her here or anywhere.
    Help me here, I'm trying to understand your logic.
  • Michael Chaplin  •  2 months ago
    As a SCUBA diver you are trained how to turn your tank back on if it gets turned off - how to suck the air out of your BCD if you have to get to the surface and a host of other lifesaving techniques. And if you look at the photos obviously they were not alone someone might have noticed him turning off her air. This is nothing more than a case of someone being in the water when they had no business being there.
  • ClarenceT  •  2 months ago
    Correct decision by the judge. You do not convict someone with zero evidence and zero motive (her father was the beneficiary of her life insurance). You have to be pretty stupid to disagree with the judge in this case. It should never have gone to Court in the first place
  • Lucky  •  Rochester, New York  •  2 months ago
    Boy is Nancy Grace going to be mad......what will she talk about on her show!
  • DutchGuy  •  2 months ago
    Whatever happened to double jeopardy?? He was already tried and spent time in jail. If folks are unhappy with the outcome of that trial, it is not the defendants fault. Let it go.....