Jerry Sandusky's Wife Denies She Ignored Rapes

Former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky's wife has denied allegations that her husband sexually abused boys in their home and that she ignored cries for help.

Sandusky was arrested Wednesday on 10 new counts of child sex abuse charges based on the testimony of two new alleged victims. The new allegations bring to 10 the number of alleged sex abuse victims.

Dottie Sandusky, who delivered a $50,000 check today to help bail her husband out of jail, was named in the testimony of one of the new alleged victims.

Mrs. Sandusky has been implicated in the alleged sex abuse crimes by three of the men who claim to have been assaulted by her husband.

The Pennsylvania attorney general's office, which is leading the investigation, would not confirm whether Dottie Sandusky was a target of their investigation or could face charges based on the testimony now available.

"I'll just say that it remains an ongoing investigation, driven by evidence and fact," said a spokesman for the department.

Wife in Penn State Scandal Implicated By Accusers

The accuser, known in the grand jury presentment as Victim 9, told a grand jury that while he was allegedly being raped in the basement of the couple's home once, he called out for her help, knowing Dottie Sandusky was upstairs. But she never came down to help him, he said.

"I have been shocked and dismayed by the allegations made against Jerry, particularly the most recent one that a now young man has said he was kept in our basement during visits and screamed for help as Jerry assaulted him while I was in our home and didn't respond to his cries for help," she said.

Jerry Sandusky, 67, is now charged with 50 counts relating to child molestation, and will appear in court for the first time to face his accusers on Tuesday. The preliminary hearing is expected to last several days.

"I continue to believe in Jerry's innocence and all the good things he has done," Mrs. Sandusky said today. "I am asking everyone to please be reasonable and open-minded until both sides of this case are heard, and Jerry has the opportunity to prove his innocence.

The new allegations match a pattern of behavior described by many of the first eight accusers who said that Sandusky sexually assaulted them in the basement of his home during sleepovers. Victim 1 told the grand jury that Sandusky would come down to tell the child it was time to go bed, and then crack his back, blow on his stomach, and eventually sexually assault him.

Victim 9, in the testimony released Wednesday, said that he was told by Sandusky to stay in the basement, where his wife rarely went, and to never go upstairs unless specifically told to do so. He claimed Sandusky brought him all of his meals to eat in the basement. The new accuser noted that there were empty bedrooms on the second floor of the residence, but he was never allowed to stay in them.

Dottie Sandusky flatly denied all of the accusations.

"No child who ever visited our home was ever forced to stay in our basement and fed there," she said. "All the kids who visited us ate with us and our kids and other guests when they were at our home."

Mrs. Sandusky said she is saddened at the accusations of abuse in her home.

"We don't know why these young men have made these false accusations, but we want everyone to know they are untrue," she said.

The attorney for Victim 4, Ben Andreozzi, said that his client would also have more specific information on Dottie Sandusky's alleged involvement in the sex abuse. Victim 4 is set to testify at the hearing beginning Tuesday.

Victim 7 may also implicate Mrs. Sandusky in his testimony during the hearing. In the grand jury presentment, the man testified that Dottie Sandusky tried to contact him in the weeks leading up to her husband's arrest, leaving him a voicemail saying it was "very important" that he call her back. He did not return the call.

Jerry Sandusky's Wife Implicated By Three Accusers

It is not clear whether the two new accusers will appear at the hearing.

Dottie Sandusky, however, will likely be called to testify at the hearing or at the later trial, despite exemptions usually given to spouses in court, according to ABC News legal analyst Dan Abrams.

"She's probably not (facing charges), but there are some interesting questions about spousal privilege," Abrams said. "Typically when a spouse confides in another spouse, that person can't be forced to testify. But she was actually a witness in the context of a very serious alleged crime. Consequently I think she would be forced to testify."

Dottie Sandusky was not able to be reached for this story. The attorney representing her husband, Joe Amendola, did not return calls for comment.

Also Read
 

813 comments

  • Alliance  •  5 months ago
    I just can't imagine how you would not know what is going on in your own home, with young children in your care. When ever I had children staying over night with my children, I would go check on them, make sure they were okay before I even went to bed-especially young kids,plus they would be asleep before i would- this just doesn't add up at all- It makes me sick to listen to all of these excuses
    • buford 5 months ago
      I had a relative (now deceased ) who was messing with kids and his wife knew all about it but said nothing and lived with it for years. She was wrong to do that but they were an older couple and had different ideas back then. Back then, if you were a woman, you stood by your man no matter what. Mrs Sandosky must be from that generation.
    • sag63 5 months ago
      They were Jerry's "guests." Jerry did 'check' on them.
    • Corey 5 months ago
      I don't know if the new victims allegations are necessarily true. I lived in State College for a long time, and I would often see Jerry and his family come into the restaurant I was working at. I never in a million years would have guessed this of him. I know that if Dottie heard something (she does has GOOD hearing) she would have done something, which is why I don't believe that any of this happened. Not under her nose...
  • doobie  •  5 months ago
    "We don't know why these 500 young men have made these false accusations."
    • CarlT 5 months ago
      I don't know why you have to lie about it. Salacious little clown aren't you?
  • VRW  •  5 months ago
    I think his wife needs to go to jail also. Accessory after the fact.
  • Glenn D  •  5 months ago
    if the biotch knew he was doing this she is as guilty as he is.
  • frank  •  5 months ago
    so.. screams from the young boys coming from the back of the house.. didn't make her wonder what jerry was doing?
  • flyklyn  •  5 months ago
    Another case of a woman electing to be blind, deaf and speechless.
  • SUSANOTK  •  5 months ago
    Personally, I cannot believe she didn't know what was goingon. He's already admitted to taking naked showers with the boys and indulging in horse play, if that isn't molestation, what is it? And this in a world where a 7 yr old boy is acused of sexual harassment for saying a teacher is "cute". Evidentially, Sandusky is not held to as high a standard as a 7 yr old boy!!!!! My feelings? She knew and she should face charges, too. What kind of woman stands by a monster?
    • Angel 5 months ago
      Exactly!
    • M T 5 months ago
      I saw that about the 7 yr. old too. How obvious he admits to showering with other people's boys. Wicked!
  • the Angry American  •  5 months ago
    Let me ask you a question, what's different from this guy, who's going to go to jail, from all those Catholic Priests who molested kids to, and is a religious establishment, and have not spent a day in jail? Guess money from the pope really does change things ~ thanks Cindy Lauper.
    • A Yahoo! User 5 months ago
      Disgusting is all that is missing. I really have no respect for any practicing Catholic and very little for the non-practicing ones. It is a religion not a nationality. You can quit anytime. Find a better religion or better yet, build a better life without one.
    • MR. M-DOC 5 months ago
      the only difference is the backing of a cult like organization unless of course sandusky is illuminati....at any rate... religion is the opiate of the masses
    • lovingme 5 months ago
      there shouldn't be any difference. some priests have been jailed however, i'm sure there are plenty more that should be.
  • Shonk  •  5 months ago
    Give me a break I can't sneak a cookie without my wife knowing.
    • David 5 months ago
      When you leave the cookie jar wide open, it's not exactly a secret.
    • hussein 5 months ago
      i think we're married to the same gal... 8===D
    • Shonk 5 months ago
      I writing a book We're All Married to the Same Woman (:-{)
  • sandiego girl  •  5 months ago
    'Believe in Jerry's innocence', ha, what about the innocence where was help when these kids hollered out for her help. SANDUSKY IS A PEDOPHILE
  • GulfWarVet  •  5 months ago
    She was in on it also!
  • the Angry American  •  5 months ago
    she took that 'stand by your man' song to far.
  • captainjp  •  5 months ago
    I think Sandusky is quilty but What I don't understand is why the boys kept going back and how did he get by with it for so long.
  • Melvin  •  5 months ago
    Why would a man want to molest a young boy when he has a willing and ready wife. Makes no sense to me. put the sob behind bars for the rest of his life. If he got castrated on the way to prison it would make me happy.
  • ScreaminFetus  •  5 months ago
    Common law traditionally considers an accessory just as guilty as the principal(s) in a crime, and subject to the same penalties. There were other at the college that knew of these molestations and did nothing about them... They need to be on trial too...

    Accessory after the fact . a person who knowingly conceals or assists another who has committed a felony.
  • Chance  •  5 months ago
    But they love kids and invite all different random ones to stay the night....
  • ROBERT Y  •  5 months ago
    Well they are both to be in prison what a waste to Humanity
  • jack  •  5 months ago
    men do not take showers with kids...Period You don't even do that with your own kids, much less others. This guy is as guilty as OJ Simpson is, and I just hope his money doesn't get him off the hook, like OJ did.
  • jamesd  •  5 months ago
    At some point we will approach the everpopular pedophile sanctuary, established most recently by other "accusations" against a large and established, well heeled organization which is known as STATUTES OF LIMITATION! IF, they did these things, they did them a long time ago! So, in effect! THEY DIDN'T DO THEM! We all "pat each other on the butt" and go home and wait for the inevitable next performance! And there will be a next performance!
  • jamesd  •  5 months ago
    Think, Depraved Indifference!