New Melanoma Drug May Extend Survival

WEDNESDAY, Feb. 22 (HealthDay News) -- Melanoma that has spread to other areas of the body is almost always fatal, but a new drug appears to double survival for those with a certain type of this skin cancer, researchers report.

A mutation in the BRAF protein occurs in about half the people who develop melanoma. Researchers say Zelboraf (vemurafenib), a drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2011, blocks that mutation, thereby killing the cancer cells.

"We demonstrated in a large group of patients overall survival approached 16 months, which is far beyond what we have seen in other trials," said lead researcher Dr. Jeffrey Sosman, a professor of medicine at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tenn.

Survival for people with advanced melanoma is usually six to 10 months. Some new drugs have extended that to maybe 11 months, "but this is the first time we have shown such a long extension in survival," he said.

All of the patients had late-stage (stage 4) melanoma. Sosman said it's hoped that Zelboraf will work even better when given sooner.

"If we use it in an earlier stage, then we are hoping to cure patients who would not be cured otherwise," he said.

Results of this phase 2 trial -- undertaken to assess the effectiveness and safety of the drug -- are published in the Feb. 23 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

For more than a year, Sosman's team followed 132 patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma, meaning the cancer had spread and was considered inoperable.

Zelboraf is a pill that patients take twice a day, and more than half who took the drug responded to it, the researchers said.

A response meant more than a 30 percent reduction in the size of tumors. Only 14 percent of patients failed to show any response to Zelboraf whatsoever, meaning their disease continued to progress.

Previously, no more than 10 percent of patients responded to any of the other available treatments, the researchers said.

The main limitation with Zelboraf is that tumors eventually become resistant.

Side effects include joint and muscle aches, which are fairly easy to manage in most patients, Sosman said.

Some patients also experienced skin changes, including sun sensitivity and rashes. "Patients develop incredible photosensitivity so patients have to be very careful about direct sunlight and use sunscreen as well as just staying out of the bright sun," Sosman said.

Also, the drug indirectly causes squamous cell cancers of the skin in some patients. "These generally never spread and are easy to remove, and patients who have gotten them can remain on treatment," Sosman said.

The drug costs around $10,000 a month, Sosman noted. "It's comparable to other cancer drugs that have shown improvement in survival, but like a lot of cancer drugs, it's expensive," he said. "You probably need to take the drug for an indefinite period of time."

Drug maker Hoffmann-La Roche funded the study.

About 70,000 Americans are diagnosed with melanoma each year. Of these, about 8,000 will die from the disease.

Dr. Michele Green, a dermatologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, said the study is a leap forward. "This finding is significant in that there is nothing right now for this kind of cancer. It's basically a death sentence," she said.

That the researchers showed improved survival is clinically significant, she said, even though "the survival wasn't that much longer."

If the drug were given for early-stage melanoma, it's possible it would improve survival even more, Green said. Eventually, she said the research will lead to a cure for melanoma.

"There's new hope every single day for melanoma," she said. "I think in our lifetime we are going to see cures for this cancer."

More information

For more information on melanoma, visit the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

 

63 comments

  • Roger  •  2 months ago
    I had a melanoma 37 years ago and after seeing many Doctors they gave me 6 months to live so don't ever give up.
  • Kyle  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  2 months ago
    It costs over $54,000 for a 6 month supply of the drug. It may work, but who can afford it!
    • Brian 2 months ago
      It's called economic selection.
    • Fred 2 months ago
      It will probably be covered by health insurance.
    • Stephanie 2 months ago
      My grandfather who is not wealthy by any means is on this drug right now. It is not 100% covered by most health insurances, so the remainder of the cost was covered by a charitable foundation. Just because it's expensive, that should never deter anyone. He and our family are thankful for this drug!
  • Vinny  •  Stockton, California  •  2 months ago
    "The drug costs around $10,000 a month" These trillion dollar wars could buy alot of medicine here at home!
    • Swing 2 months ago
      Don't tell any Republican that..
    • Vinny 2 months ago
      Ron Paul knows this and would rather see the cost of these wars spent here at home
    • M.W. 2 months ago
      Totally agree with sentiment, but reality is that the big pharma corporations would rig the supply chain to suck up the trillion$ via higher price on sales ! -- all with blessings from greedy right wing controlled capitalists and politicians with tax law entitlements to boot !.
      The same thing that is happening NOW with "shortages" of one the most successful childhood cancer drugs in heavy demand and use -- all because of low profit margins after the patent expired.
  • Ólafur G  •  2 months ago
    I got a melanoma when I was 22. It was the size of a quarter on my scalp and they removed it. Well, 9 years later and things seem all right with me. Just take care of yourselves; protect your skin and you'll be protecting what it covers. :)
  • FBGeorge  •  2 months ago
    All it takes is money...lots of it.
    • Stephanie 2 months ago
      My grandfather who is not wealthy by any means is on this drug right now. It is not 100% covered by most health insurances, so the remainder of the cost was covered by a charitable foundation. Just because it's expensive, that should never deter anyone. He and our family are thankful for this drug!
    • FBGeorge 2 months ago
      I am very glad for your grandfather, Stephanie. He is one of the blessed ones.
  • la1961  •  Norfolk, Virginia  •  2 months ago
    My sister had a melanoma removed in 1995 (stage 2) and 15 years later it was found to have metastasized (we all thought she was free and clear). She was never advised to have anything other than skin screenings. She lived 3 months and a day when it was found in her lung, liver, trachea and brain. So keep up with the screenings and blood test. This news is wonderful to hear. There was absolutely nothing to do for my sister other than to make funeral arrangements, 52 years old. I pray for a cure for all cancers, hard to swallow that none have been found.
  • JeffreyL  •  2 months ago
    after surviving tounge cancer (squamous cell ) i had 37 rounds of chemo and 13 weeks of radiation finally they ended taking some of my tounge but im still here and getting better every day so dont ever give up No i didnt smoke Cancer can strike anyone it has no limits if you are tough and say you can you will you too can be a survivor
  • Connecticut Yankee  •  Stamford, Connecticut  •  2 months ago
    Keep finding the cure!!!
  • White Bird  •  2 months ago
    My mother has lung cancer or had it. It was stage 2 and that was 4 yrs. ago and now there is no sign of the cancer except from what they see as scar tissue. Today she is going strong as if it had never happened. Please people don't never give up because that is the worst disease that cancer lives off of.
  • Jon Liebowitz  •  2 months ago
    I had melanoma 30 years ago (level 3). The key is catch it early. Glad to see there is some hope for those where it has metastasized. Nasty stuff.
  • Vince  •  2 months ago
    Only good for half of the melanoma patients who have the braf mutation.
  • Alex  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  2 months ago
    My Father passed away last year of Melanoma at age 49. Although this might help....it is only delaying the inevitable at a very high price for those who might not know of the treatment or simply can't afford it. Please, Keep the research going for a cure!!
  • clare  •  2 months ago
    Not to worry, though. The pharmaceutical company will find another application to extend their rights to exclusive marketing....another cancer...giving it to people who might, someday, possibly be at risk...or not...to keep it profitable for a little while longer before they quit making it.
  • clare  •  2 months ago
    A step forward, hopefully, toward a long term cure. UNTIL it becomes a generic and is no longer PROFITABLE enough and becomes hard to find. I am not sure that 80,000 people a year is enough for greedy pharma. I am thinking that medicine should NOT be subject to the whims of the capitalist system.
    • Victor 2 months ago
      You prefer drugmaking slavery instead, robbing those who discover miracles that extend life of any compensation, because "drugs should be free", which is the single best way to stop them from being developed.
    • Cathy 2 months ago
      Victor.........do you work for BIG PHARMA??? There are no miracles in cancer TREATMENT.................never a mention of a CURE!!! It's ALL a money making scam so graciously given to us by the MEDICAL INDUSTRY....that's doctors, hospitals and big pharma! The cancer TREATMENT scam reaks of unethical behavior by ALL involved. Hospitals get PAID to use certain TREATMENTS!
    • clare 2 months ago
      Victor, I never said they should be "free". And I don't know what "drugmaking slavery" could possibly mean. Believe me, I'd bet most of the people who develop effective medicines hardly realize anything but a salary. I don't pretend to have the answers...only a desire to look over how it is done now. Some compensation is appropriate, of course, and is to be encouraged. But, once the 'miracles' are discovered, is there no way to keep the miracle coming besides huge profits? Once the profit motive is diminished (apparently, not even gone completely) the "lifesaving" component of this industry fades away. There is a drug out there for children with leukemia, mostly I think, who are running out of the only drug of its kind...because the drug production is "less profitable" according to some reporting, if this is the way it is working. THIS is a shame on the big pharma you apparently support...without concern.
  • L J  •  Austin, Texas  •  2 months ago
    "May" is the operative word.
  • Kristin  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  2 months ago
    Check your skin! See a dermatologist annually whether you want to or not! By a total fluke a college roommate discovered my Stage III malignant melanoma when I was 19....that was 23 years ago when nobody even knew about it...miraculously I survived. Once you are to the point of having to rely on these meds for a few extra months of life it's too late I'm afraid.
  • Mullet Over  •  Olympia, Washington  •  2 months ago
    Just yesterday there was a huge shortage of cancer drugs.
  • bertha fay  •  Austin, Texas  •  2 months ago
    I have watched a close friend and my father die of cancer. Whenever I hear people encouraging the people to fight the disease to the very end I cringe.

    Personally, I would weigh my odds of recovery versus the pain, discomfort I would have to endure and choose the most comfortable, dignified way to exit this life.

    I am glad they continue with their research, BUT physicians must take their patient's desires into consideration on how they choose to live the last months of their lives. No pushing people to "fight" when all they want is peace to enjoy their end of life.
  • HTNM  •  Chandler, Arizona  •  2 months ago
    May extend survival...with exactly what possible long-term side effects, complications and exactly what kind of quality of life will the person have?
  • Squisshy chin  •  Toronto, Canada  •  2 months ago
    I had Clark Level 2 melenoma back in 2006 and was fortunate that it was detected early enough. A wide surgical excision was able to get all the cancer cells, whereby, chemo was avoided. This has to be one of the most least knowledable cancers. More people need information with this type of potentially deadly cancer so they can better protect themselves from the elements that causes it.