Organic Brown Rice Syrup: Hidden Arsenic Source

If you're shopping organic and see brown rice syrup listed first among ingredients, you may want to think twice: That product could have high levels of potentially toxic arsenic, Dartmouth researchers reported today.

A team led by environmental chemist Brian P. Jackson found what Jackson called dangerous amounts of arsenic in organic powdered toddler formula whose top ingredient was brown rice syrup. That formula contained six times more arsenic than the Environmental Protection Agency considers safe for the water supply.

Jackson and his colleagues also reported elevated arsenic levels in some brown rice-sweetened cereal bars, energy bars and energy "shots"consumed by endurance athletes, according to a study published today in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.The results, which do not identify any products by name, follow recent reports about trace levels of arsenic in apple juice and previous reports of arsenic in rice.

Given that organic brown rice syrup "may introduce significant concentrations of arsenic to an individual's diet," the researchers saw "an urgent need for regulatory limits on arsenic in food." Dietary sources of arsenic represent "potentially a big public health issue that has not been taken on board," Jackson told ABCNews.com.

The Food and Drug Administration has been sampling and testing a variety of "more conventional" rice products, including rice crackers and rice cereals, "to evaluate what the risk is and what the levels are in these products" said Siobhan DeLancey, a spokeswoman for the agency's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

Depending on what the testing reveals, she said there was "a possibility" that the agency would set a threshold for arsenic levels in rice. The FDA previously set a "level of concern" of 23 parts per billion of arsenic for fruit juices, the only other food to have such a designated level. The EPA standard for arsenic in drinking water is 10 ppb.

"The bottom line is this shows there's a need for FDA to figure out some limits on this and put that out there," said Patty Lovera, assistant director of Food and Water Watch, a consumer advocacy group in Washington, D.C. She said FDA needs to take a broader approach toward arsenic in what we eat, rather than going "food by food."

"There's been quite a lot of press on arsenic in rice in the past six years, but less so on the rice products," Jackson told ABCNews.com. As Americans consume more rice-containing foods, they're unknowingly ingesting more arsenic, he cautioned. He pointed out that they're buying more organic packaged foods, more gluten-free products made from rice instead of wheat flour, and choosing foods sweetened with organic brown rice syrup because of the buzz they've heard linking high-fructose corn syrup and obesity.

But they're frequently unaware that many of these foods contain rice. "Even if you were an educated consumer, some products might just creep under the radar," Jackson said in an interview Wednesday.

The maker of organic toddler formula with brown rice syrup probably "has the best of intentions. They're trying to produce a ... formula people want to buy," Jackson said.

Jackson said he originally was studying arsenic levels in major brands of baby formulas, but even those made with rice starch were low. However, two organic formulas, intended for toddlers, (one milk-based, the other soy-based) made with brown rice syrup had 20 to 30 times more arsenic than the other formulas.

Baby Formula Findings Extended to Rice Syrup-Sweetened Foods

That sparked his interest in broader testing of packaged organic foods with and without brown rice syrup, purchased from local supermarket aisles in Hanover, N.H. The researchers tested infant formulas, cereal bars, energy bars and energy "shots," which are gels consumed by endurance athletes.

Arsenic occurs in several forms, some thought to be more dangerous than others. Organic forms of arsenic can be found naturally in the soil, along with arsenic-based pesticides used before the EPA banned them in 2009. Rice, Jackson noted, "takes up more arsenic than all the other grains."

Inorganic arsenic is considered much more toxic than organic arsenic, Jackson said. Brown rice is usually higher in total arsenic and inorganic arsenic than white rice because the outer layer that's removed in white rice contains the inorganic arsenic. However, another form of arsenic can be found inside the grain of both white and brown rice.

The EPA drinking water standard is 10 parts per billion for total arsenic, which combines inorganic and organic arsenic. Jackson's team tested one package of soy-based toddler formula made with organic brown rice syrup and found a total arsenic level of 60 ppb, including about 25 ppb of inorganic arsenic.

That kind of level is dangerous, given toddlers' size and developing bodies, they said. Given the variety of formula brands available, he said, "I would choose one that wasn't based on organic brown rice syrup."

They also detected arsenic levels ranging from 23 to 128 ppb in cereal bars made with brown rice syrup; and levels of 84 to 171 ppb in three flavors of energy shots.

"I don't necessarily think eating a cereal bar every couple of days is a health risk," said Jackson, who collaborated on the study with researchers at Dartmouth's Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Center, which is funded by the EPA and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. "But we don't have any guidelines for maximum allowable amounts in food or the cumulative amount of arsenic intake during the day."

"There's no perfect advice," Lovera said. "There's no one thing people can do." But she said, the surprising presence of arsenic in packaged foods give people a chance to ask themselves, "How many foods do I need to eat that are processed with ingredients I don't really know that much about?"

Also Read
 
  • Neena  •  3 months ago
    why did the author not share the formula brand that the arsenic was found in?
    • James Dogue 3 months ago
      Because they want to protect their friends from market forces?
    • JRD 3 months ago
      Possible slander suit....
    • Kristin 3 months ago
      Just read the ingredients list for brown rice syrup. Sometimes when people read articles like this, they mistakenly boycott the brand rather than the ingredient, and end up buying other foods that contain the ingredient.
  • cem  •  3 months ago
    Hey, Lovera, maybe no perfect advice, but naming the products would surly have helped. Duh!
    • Sarah 3 months ago
      Seriously! I'm on a google goose hunt looking for ingredient lists which are harder to find than you'd think!
    • Other 3 months ago
      It probably boils down to someone not wanting to be sued by the producers of these products.
    • Marie 3 months ago
      Absolutely correct Other. Sadly, Lobbyists and Lawyers are the hunting dogs of corporate America. What we need to do is OUT Monsanto!!!
  • Kaimana  •  Rye, New York  •  3 months ago
    Brown rice is natural, but so is ARSENIC.
    • Ea 3 months ago
      The syrup is a concentrate therefor a concentrate of arsenic.
  • CE  •  3 months ago
    I just hate it when I find arsenic in my organic brown rice syrup.
    • kapusta 3 months ago
      lol ! me too. especially my baby formula !
    • notarunaroundsue 3 months ago
      might be good idea to avoid ORGANIC stuff now...
    • BrettW 3 months ago
      *Rolls eyes* Yeah because the people that have been living for thousands of years were eating processed food at the time too. This another scare that is unfounded. Has anyone come forward with arsenic poisoning symptoms yelling "I ATE TOO MUCH BROWN RICE/SYRUP!!!!"? I would guess no. Seeing how we consume a variety of different things that are bad for us ,in trace amounts like this, I see no reason to panic.
  • omerlm  •  3 months ago
    Organic or not, wherever a food is grown, it has the probability of picking up whatever is naturally in the soil. ie Idaho has pretty high amounts of naturally radioactive uranium in the soil - guess what? The potatoes grown there have trace amounts of uranium in them.
    • myAmerica 3 months ago
      Well that is informative. We can thank our DOE for that. The nuclear testing they did that spread it across from Nevada. Wait until that contaminated water finally hits the eastern side of the underground watershed. In Africa the Uranium is leached into the plants so the radiation levels from African ash is higher than any other source of natural (background) radiation. I really wonder if we would have "background" radiation if we hadn't developed nuclear weapons. Kodak and other film makers knew right away that the government was spreading radiation, it exposed their film when the trucks drove through the dust cloud miles away from the testing sights. Stay on it your've got a good head. Keep using it. Good luck.
    • Carley 3 months ago
      Only that that uranium is not necessarily "natural". A lot of nuclear tests were done in that area, and in the deserts, which contaminated everything with radioactive isotopes, including people's thyroids being exposed to radiation. The question should be, what is the source of the food we eat, and then go by the history of all these experiments carried out.
    • Celebrim 3 months ago
      Geez people are dumb. Look, the uranium on the Colorado plateau is naturally occuring. Where do you think the few pounds they used to make the bombs came from? From the tons and tons and tons of it minded in Colorado, much of which was used in the early 20th century to make brightly colored orange paint for table ware before anyone really realized radiation might be dangerous. Chunks of unrefined uranium ore are scattered all over Colorado and the surrounding area. Your kid can just pick up and play with them. Those rocks didn't drift there through the air from nuclear weapons tests hundreds of miles away. Sure, there is vaporized uranium contamination, but that's not what is being talked about here. What is being talked about is that you can pick up a rock in Colorado, put it in your pocket, and be giving yourself an X-Ray. (This actually happened to a geological professor friend of mine. Even he didn't realize what he'd picked up until it ruined an exposure on some film he was developing.) As for the rice, Arsenic is a naturally occurring compound in the Ozarks. At one time, back in the early 20th century, this was actually advertised as healthy. One of the bottling companies in Hot Springs was named, "Arsenic Springs", and they used to ship it naturally. So it wouldn't surprise me much if some Arkansas grown rice is naturally high in arsenic. Even more so though, it wouldn't surprise me at all if this is processed food products imported from China where they don't have any standards regulating food products, no culture of accountability, no empowered public that can sue companies, etc. and thus 19th century standards of industrial food prevail. The could literally be dumping arsenic into the grain silos to keep the rats from eating the rice and it wouldn't surprise me. As for 'organic' that's the biggest snake oil scam in the history of food. Hemlock is organic; it doesn't mean it is good for you.
  • LAE  •  Baton Rouge, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
    Arsenic is a naturally occurring metal found in soil. Not all rice will have arsenic. It will depend on the soil in which it was grown.
  • Nick  •  3 months ago
    '"I don't necessarily think eating a cereal bar every couple of days is a health risk," said Jackson,'
    Oh really? Isn't arsenic one of the heavy metals that accumulates in the body? I guess you could space them out so you wouldn't die so quickly.
  • Nick  •  3 months ago
    What's the problem? It's organic arsenic :) But seriously, if the level is over twice the allowable level for water, why is there not a recall? And why aren't consumers being told so they can avoid those foods. Or do we just stop buying anything with brown rice syrup in it?
  • Shelia  •  Orlando, Florida  •  3 months ago
    This article is sorta loose with the facts: such as which countries; percent of contamination; which brands; etc.
  • Shay  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 months ago
    So interesting to see that "organic" can be labeled as dangerous. It is such a shame that they won't write the articles about all of the GMO in USA foods. 151 other countries have banned GMO's but our gov and FDA not only approve it, they say that it will hurt business to label which foods are GMO. look it up. corn syrup, roundup, soy. We feed this #$%$ to our kids without knowing and the gov is making it near impossible to maintain our health with organics. The vitamin market is now flooded with GMO too. Why is it bad do you ask? Do you want to be eating food that has been genetically modified to excrete poison from the plant itself?? WAKE UP. The gov is feeding this sht to our kids in the school programs. Just wait until the rest of the country wakes up, the tainted food will be pulled and people will be left with empty store shelves.
  • Community First...  •  2 months ago
    While this article is likely an infomercial for artificial sweeteners and HFCS, it's important to keep our eyes, ears, and taste buds open.
    Big growers are lobbying to reduce standards in organic farming to get into the business. They want to bamboozle us with 'acceptable' poisons.
    We must all continue to demand more from our growers, regulators, authorities, and representatives.
    I'm glad these studies are out there, but they must be consistent and objective. The headline should have spoken about Arsenic in Rice, in general. The focus on 'organic' seems highly suspect.
    From a different point of view, perhaps it is news for 'organics' because it is NOT news for conventional farming --everyone who grows and buys conventional foods knows and accepts the fact that these could and are grown, produced, and preserved with toxic chemicals.
    Anyway, if there are dangers in 'organics', imagine all of the trash in conventional food products and produce!
    Yet, folks don't talk about this, when in fact we should be getting news everyday about the many carcinogenics considered acceptable in conventional farming.
  • Chris  •  Agoura Hills, California  •  3 months ago
    If you eat whole brown rice or almost any vegetable, fruit, nut or tubar for that matter, you're going to be consuming some amount arsenic. Arsenic is a mineral that's naturally present in the Earth....and, within the human body (arsenic is an essential micro-mineral at very low levels within the human body). Therefore, consuming a variety of healthy, predominantly unprocessed foods is the best approach to ensure you're getting the most of what your body needs, and in the delivery form closest to nature. Convenience foods are just more concentrated, and thus there's a trade-off that should be expected somewhere. That isn't to say that food (or supplements or drug) formulators can't reduce the amount of heavy metals present within ingredients used (to some degree) by creating and sticking to well-defined ingredient specifications that are also realistic. It's just that in my experience there are alot of people and companies within their respective industries that don't really know anything about the ingredients with which they're assumed by their consumers to be experts about. Also, something that wasn't discussed, but maybe is worth stating is that Arsenic, though problematic in higher concentrations, like most things may also have a beneficial side (e.g., wine, chocolate, etc). For example, organic forms of arsenic are providing positive effects in various cancer-related clinical trials. Thus, when you see reporting like this that claims (directly or indirectly) that ANY amount is bad or that ANY amount found in a food source may be unacceptible, it should be a warning that they likely haven't performed all of their homework to provide a clear perspective and to fully inform. - Chris Lockwood, PhD
  • phillip  •  3 months ago
    we live in a polluted universe and all we can do is use common sense and make the best decisions we can....
  • J  •  3 months ago
    I think the food industry should be more closely monitored and scrutinized... just like the drug industry. It's very common for a drug to be taken off the market and they have to post lots of warnings. The same should be done for the food we ingest. For instance I'm always surprised by certain artificial sweeteners used. If you look at most packs of gum/candy you'll see Phenylketonurics listed in bold letters. That's poison to human beings but manufacturers are allowed to let us ingest it. I have to admit I'm not a fan of government agencies making it difficult for manufacturers to conduct business. However, when it comes to people's safety and health that should be the number one priority.
  • trinity  •  3 months ago
    The food of the week targeted for demonization. We're all better off watching Super Size Me; that film took time and thought to produce, unlike Yahoo Journalism Skewed Results. I am sick of polls and studies that are totally meaningless to the public, but beneficial to the people that profit off them.
  • William  •  3 months ago
    Don't buy processed foods. Don't eat processed food unless you have processed them. don't eat anythying with added sugars, sweetners or extenders. Know what you are eating. Know how it was prepared for consumption. If you must eat meat, make certain that it does not contain added and artifical hormones; make certain it is fresh without peservatives. Eat wisely. namaste
  • Mr Coto  •  New Orleans, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
    They lie to us and kill us. They want us to "think twice" about eating organic, but have no problem feeding us the poisons such as GMO's, fluoride, and chemical additives. It's all part of the eugenics program. And we're the expendable lab-rats.
  • apollocircle  •  Newark, California  •  3 months ago
    Funny, corn syrup has mercury. They still dump that in everything.
  • Robert F  •  Bossier City, Louisiana  •  3 months ago
    so why isn't any of that stuff removed from the shelves immediately and destroyed? what's the point of the FDA if not to prevent these types of things from happening or at the very least doing something about it after the fact? why should we have to look at labels to make sure the brand you buy doesn't have too much of a toxic substance in it? ridiculous...I've got a great idea that repukes will love, lets get rid of regulations so that things like this happen more often
  • peastalker  •  3 months ago
    Sounds like a smear campaign from the corn syrup industry! And by the way where is the person who published this study credentials. It reads like a college thesis. Dis-closer would provide support to you claim. But can find none. So therefor it is just a slam against a good product