Return of the Culture Wars: Can Mitt Romney Win Conservative Backing?

The resurgence of social and cultural issues in voters' minds poses new challenges for GOP presidential front-runner Mitt Romney as he reels from surprising losses Tuesday to conservative favorite Rick Santorum.

The economy remains the No. 1 issue of concern for a majority of Americans. But the recent hoopla surrounding the Obama administration's support of contraceptives, the court ruling against California's same-sex marriage ban and heated debate about abortion access has created a perfect storm that has pushed these seemingly dormant issues to the surface.

"They've never been far from the surface. A lot of people thought the social issues had disappeared but that has never been the case," said Karlyn Bowman, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute who focuses on polling data and public opinion. "These issues are obviously very important within a conservative party, the Republican party."

Even the general public has increasingly leaned to the right. In a Gallup poll last month, 40 percent of Americans identified themselves as conservative, 35 percent as moderate and 21 percent as liberal. The numbers marked the third straight year that conservatives outnumbered moderates, which have declined steadily since the early 1990s.

An overwhelming number of Republicans – 51 percent – dubbed themselves as "conservatives" while 20 percent classified themselves as "very conservative," far outweighing moderates. The poll also found that independents, who make up the largest political group in the country, were mostly conservative-leaning, with 41 percent putting themselves in that category.

"In recent years, conservatives have become the single largest group, consistently outnumbering moderates since 2009 and outnumbering liberals by 2 to 1. Overall, the nation has grown more ideologically polarized over the past decade," the analysis stated. "The increase in the proportion of conservatives is entirely the result of increased conservatism among Republicans and independents, and is also seen in Americans 30 and older -- particularly seniors."

Santorum, with his staunch anti-abortion stance and Christian ideology, has strong backing among conservatives who still view Romney and his record with skepticism. Newt Gingrich was able to attract some of that conservative support in South Carolina but his personal record, including two failed marriages and an affair with his current wife while he was still married, has come under much public scrutiny.

Santorum "has been a consistent conservative in the debates. He's raised a lot of social issues that haven't been the focus of Romney and Gingrich in the debates," Bowman said.

The former senator from Pennsylvania supports a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, as well as banning abortion even in the case of rape and not allowing homosexual couples to adopt children.

Romney, meanwhile, has struggled to convince the Republican base of his conservative credentials. Most recently, he came under fire for allowing "abortion pills" as governor of Massachusetts. In 2005, Romney signed a law that required all Massachusetts hospitals, including those owned by religious groups, to provide emergency contraception to rape victims.

Romney had initially opposed that requirement but later said that "in my heart of hearts, is that people who are subject to rape should have the option of having emergency contraception or emergency contraception information."

That same year, Romney vetoed a law allowing the disbursement of the controversial morning-after pill by pharmacists without a doctor's prescription, but the state Senate overrode his veto.

Romney's business record has worked in his favor, with exit polls in early states showing that most primary voters viewed it with a favorable eye. But his changing views on highly volatile social issues, including abortion, have yet to win him favor among conservatives. Such hesitancy was in full display Tuesday in Minnesota, where Romney did not carry a single county even though its former governor, Tim Pawlenty, campaigned for him.

"Romney has to go back to mollifying that base, which is not something he wanted to do," political analyst Norm Ornstein said. "What it means for Romney is that he's going to have to make more and more sharply conservative pledges and try to trigger even more of that conservative antipathy [against President Obama]."

But that could be a challenging task for the former governor who faces a more difficult road to the nomination than many expected. "The more he does this, he looks phony," Ornstein said.

The focus on social issues among the U.S. electorate doesn't bode well for Obama either. He has taken much heat for his administration's decision to require religious schools, universities, charities and hospitals to provide contraceptive services in their insurance plans.

House Speaker John Boehner today became the latest Republican to jump into the showdown, saying that if the administration doesn't reverse the policy, Congress will.

"In imposing this requirement, the federal government is violating a First Amendment right that has stood for more than two centuries, and it is doing so in a manner that affects millions of Americans and harms some of our nation's most vital institutions," Boehner, R-Ohio, said on the House floor. "If the president does not reverse the department's attack on religious freedom, then the Congress, acting on behalf of the American people and the Constitution we are sworn to uphold and defend, must."

The House, comprised of a number of freshman lawmakers who won based on their firm opposition to abortion, has already introduced a number of bills tightening abortion restrictions and defunding Planned Parenthood.

Still, if the Republican race goes into the summer, as many now expect, even the focus on social issues would bode well for the president, experts say.

"Certainly one of the things that's happening now is people are feeling less frantic about the economy and so other issues do emerge more," Ornstein said. "Are they going to supersede the economy? If they do, that's great news for Barack Obama, even if he suffers some with the decision on contraception, because it's a signal that the economy is receding as an issue and if the economy is receding as an issue that means things are going well."

Also Read
 
  • .  •  3 months ago
    These Republican gluttons of privilege are cold men. They are cunning men. And it is their constant aim to put the Government of the United States under the control of men like themselves. They want a return of the Wall Street economic dictatorship.
    • CafeenMan 3 months ago
      Exactly. They only want small government that is exclusive to them.
  • autumn wind songd  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
    i wish the gov't would stay out of my bedroom and vagina
    • Rich 3 months ago
      :) What's the problem? Just have an abortion.
    • BUBBA 3 months ago
      haha good one Autumn..
    • Taryn 3 months ago
      Rich LOL, and Autumn...seriously men controlling women's issues? Do we try to enforce when they need a prostate exam or a vasectomy?
  • .  •  3 months ago
    Republicans want an administration that will assure privilege for big business, regardless of what may happen to the rest of the Nation.
  • Pan  •  3 months ago
    I keep hearing the conservative christians saying "Why do I have to pay for food stamps". Well, because YOUR god tells you to that is why!
    “Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger, and you invited Me in; 36 naked, and you clothed Me; I was sick, and you visited Me; I was in prison, and you came to Me.’ 37 Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, and feed You, or thirsty, and give You something to drink? 38 And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You in, or naked, and clothe You? 39 When did we see You sick, or in prison, and come to You?’ 40 The King will answer and say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it to Me.’

    41 “Then He will also say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels; 42 for I was hungry, and you gave Me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me nothing to drink; 43 I was a stranger, and you did not invite Me in; naked, and you did not clothe Me; sick, and in prison, and you did not visit Me.’ 44 Then they themselves also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not [a]take care of You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”
    • CafeenMan 3 months ago
      American Christians only like the parts of the bible that they can twist to support their views and bash anyone they don't like. The rest of the bible, particularly things that would apply to them personally that would require them to live in a way they don't like, isn't so important. Those parts of the bible are merely suggestions.
    • J A 3 months ago
      My God tells me that my charitable obligations belong to me and His Church. He has never said that my charity must be filtered through the government.
    • CafeenMan 3 months ago
      Your god told me he never told you anything, J A.
  • marnie  •  Port Orange, Florida  •  3 months ago
    I am so sick of this culture clash. We need to focus on jobs, energy, taxes & all the problems we have. Republicans love to bring up these social issues so they don't have to talk about what is really important to most of us.
    • RandyH 3 months ago
      Totally agree.
  • Trollbro  •  3 months ago
    We Republicans jus want dat big gubbamint to leave us alone and stay out of our lives! We also needs laws against gay marriage, abortion, labor unions, birth control, sex ed...
    • ZmanString 3 months ago
      Well put, Trollbro! Made me grin!
  • .  •  3 months ago
    The Primary System has failed the repub party.
    Too much time, money and energy spent on losers.
  • nightguy  •  3 months ago
    "The more he (Romney) does this, he looks phony." Well, that's because he is phony.
  • PERRY  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
    We ONLY see some people talking loud about ABORTION, GAY PEOPLE, RELIGION etc during elections. No law in this wide world can outlaw any of these "social issues". We should stop our politicians that continue to fool us. Take all these topics OFF politics. As far as I'm concerned, I'm very neutral because I consider raising these topics during election is a ploy for politicians to get votes depending on where they live. Any of these does not affect the way I vote, either a politician is in support or against, I base my voting on the QUALITY of the candidate(s). This is why Mitt Romney has been a WISHY-WASHY politician and he has been getting away with it. I don't blame him. I only blame the gullible voters.
  • Paddy Raghunathan  •  3 months ago
    Not just Romney, it is a worry for the Republican Party. Culture wars at this stage mean one thing: the Republicans don't believe they are going to win in November. If you look at the low numbers of people coming out to vote, it is a sign for the Republicans. Everyone looks at Romney and says he can't find a narrative. I don't think anyone in the Republican party has found a narrative. Gingrich has gone cold. Santorum did not have a presence in the states Gingrich did well. Ron Paul is a strong voice, but not not strong enough, and there are people who say he is a true conservative, but when he has the courage to say he'll pull back the troops, conservatives balk and turn tail.

    The trouble is that we have a Republican Party that doesn't have a clue on what should be its agenda. If it did, it would find a front runner who could speak to its needs.
  • Dave  •  3 months ago
    Reading yahoo comments is a good reminder of how many idiots are out there walking around. So please be carefull today
  • Episode V fan  •  Portland, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    Personally, I would rather vote for a Kardashian then any one of these four nut jobs. They have taken away the party my dad loved and one that I am a member of. What was once a party that was more Moderate, is now just a bunch a bible thumping loons out to make the American people so poor we have to do whatever they want.
    I am thinking of becoming a "non Affeliated" voter.
    Bring back "Teddy Roosevelt", someone who cared about the poor guy and giving him a fair shake.
    We all need to really evaluate what we want for the next four years, and vote for the people who are willing to do our bidding, not us doing theirs.
  • Rick  •  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  •  3 months ago
    Hmmm. Requiring insurance companies to cover prescription birth control under their plan is 'anti-religious freedom' BUT refusing to allow a mosque to be built is not 'anti-religious freedom'??

    What word comes straight to mind?? HYPOCRITE!
  • Mike S  •  Brush Prairie, Washington  •  3 months ago
    When did the reactionaries abscond with the conservative principles and pervert them?
  • Manning2Tyree  •  Richardson, Texas  •  3 months ago
    Romney was for abortion, before he was against it.....or something like that.
  • Harry  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  3 months ago
    Focus on the "culture wars", win the nomination, lose the election.
    Excellent strategy.
  • D-Llusional Viet Vet  •  Prescott, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    I read through some of the comments-------GREAT------People are #$%$ Now maybe some good may come out of this but we need to also focus on the greedy idiots in congressThey are as much to blame if not more-------Wish we had more presidential options
  • BF  •  Richmond, Virginia  •  3 months ago
    Equal Opportunity, does not mean Equal Outcome
  • JC  •  3 months ago
    It's 2012 and we have people arguing against contraceptives? I mean really! Get a life people. Regarding Catholics, the group we are trying to #$%$ kiss now, I can tell you that 80% of Catholics either use, approve of using or are apathetic to what their "leaders" say: They don't think it's the churches business to tell them what to do regarding birth control. And to those witty folks who will say govt. can't tell people what to do either, relax, no one is forcing anyone to take a pill. They are just trying to give women an option. If you don't want it, don't take it.Relax people, it's not the end of the world!
  • A Yahoo! User  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
    So, just when Romney thought he had it wrapped up, so he could pretend to move to the middle and be more liberal, he how has to fight off Santorum, meaning he'll have to pretend to be even more conservative than before. Who is this guy really? Who knows. He's whatever the campaign demands at any given time. But come November, you can bet that the political ads will expose every flip flop he makes along the way.