U.S. Embassy in Syria Closed, Diplomats Evacuated

The United States has whisked its remaining diplomats out of Syria and suspended operations at its embassy in Damascus as violence there continues to increase, U.S. officials told ABC News.

The skeletal staff, including Ambassador Robert Ford, departed quietly despite in some cases being denied exit visas by Syrian authorities, the officials said.

"The recent surge in violence, including bombings in Damascus on Dec. 23 and Jan. 6, has raised serious concerns that our Embassy is not sufficiently protected from armed attack," State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said today. "We, along with several other diplomatic missions, conveyed our security concerns to the Syrian government but the regime failed to respond adequately."

The embassy had already drawn down its staffing over the past several months amid concerns about their security. After the latest round of reductions in January a core group of only 17 remained in the country. Some departed overland to Jordan while others flew out of the airport in the capital.

The shuttering of the embassy follows similar steps by other Western countries in recent weeks. A U.S. official said that talks are ongoing with Poland to serve as the American protecting power in Syria while the U.S. embassy is closed.

Today's move comes after the Obama administration says its requests to Syrian authorities for increased security around the American embassy and its diplomats fell on deaf ears. The embassy is situated on a busy intersection in Damascus and officials say they feared al Qaeda elements, which are believed to be behind a string of car bombs in the Syrian capital, could target the Americans next. They had requested that the street the embassy is on be closed, but nothing was done.

The embassy had already been targeted by a pro-Assad mob last July after Ambassador Ford defied restrictions on his travel outside the capital and visited the restive city of Hama. Some in the crowd scaled the outer walls of the embassy and defaced the exterior, including the American flag, before being chased away by embassy guards.

The U.S. embassy, like other diplomatic facilities there, is guarded by Syrian security forces. U.S. officials say they were slow to respond and accused the government of sponsoring the protest.

Similar mobs have targeted Ambassador Ford's convoy when he went to visit a prominent opposition leader in September. Ford and his staff barricade themselves in the leader's office for several hours before Syrian security finally arrived to disperse the crowd. As they left the pro-Assad protestors pelted the cars with rocks, eggs, and tomatoes, damaging one of them significantly, officials said at the time.

The Syrian government's crackdown on the movement to oust President Assad has become increasingly bloody in recent months. The United Nations stopped counting the dead late last month, saying it was too hard to keep up with and verify the body counts. At the time it placed the death toll at more than 5,400. Since then there have been reports of hundreds more killed.

Opposition elements have also stepped up efforts to fight back, raising fears that the once peaceful movement could evolve into a civil war.

Ambassador Ford has been one of the most vocal critics of the Assad government over the past year. In August President Obama called on Assad to step down, and the United States has supported resolutions in the United Nations Security Council that would do the same.

The latest effort at the United Nations, proposed by Morocco and backed by the Arab League, was vetoed on Saturday by Russia and China who have maintained support for President Assad and are reluctant to endorse another resolution that could lead to foreign intervention like in the case of Libya.

Also Read
 
  • John J.  •  3 months ago
    I remember reading my parent's Look and Life magazines 45 years ago and noticing 2 things; fighting in the Middle East and starving in Africa. Fast forward 45 years and it's still the same stories.
    • Neevah 3 months ago
      And the cause of both: religion. Give people ability to control their own bodies despite the catholic church, africa would starve less.
    • SHAKIRP 3 months ago
      Neevah, of course, you are wrong. Before this latest "Arab Spring", only Lebanon had a truly religious civil war, all other violence was about power. Check it out.
    • Condor 3 months ago
      starving in africa? population control. cant give those people more resources they flourish and we cant have that. ask the UN. middle east? that one is more complex. i think there is a bigger picture there that no one but the iluinatti sees and is aware of. clearly it involves israel. as for the condition of that place? population control. 5 billion people live in poverty because the UN wants it that way. america has remained small and off their radar. but we are next
  • Duke  •  3 months ago
    Sanctions do not work. Recalling diplomats do not work. These countries will do what they please, and turning ones back on genocide and fight for freedom is immoral.
    • Dr. Zook 3 months ago
      Recalling diplomats works to keep your diplomats alive.
    • lor 3 months ago
      CUT ALL FOREIGN AID..
    • Mike 3 months ago
      Sanctions have proven to work - maybe not in this particular case but in most they do.
  • Kevin  •  3 months ago
    Is it just me or is most of this country blind? Ron Paul has been talking about getting rid of all the U.S. embassys oversees for awhile now and yet people continue to vote aganist him in favor of Mitt " RobMe " Romney, I guess everyone wants more of the same instead of a true leader who will change this country for the better and knows how to do it, really could have sworn that Ron Paul has been saying from the very beginning that he would eliminate all the U.S. embassys from around the world and stop nation building in other countries, it makes sense and it would save us a ton of money that we could mabye use to pay off our debt to China? - SMH - Well the media can keep hyping up Mitt Romney all they want, I know exactly who I am voting for, the only one that will change this country for the better, RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Craig 3 months ago
      3rd party time
    • Got Gold 3 months ago
      No not embassy's,military bases.
    • Nice 3 months ago
      Kevin,
      The U.S. Embassy's on foreign soils are our direct points of contact for political negotiations, provide services for American's who are living and working abroad, and also provide secure facilities for agents (FBI, SS, DEA, etc.).
      It's understood that the Embassy's and Consulate offices appear to be a waste of money but in the grand scheme of it all...there are many 'unknown' purposes for these facilities. Many of these purposes well above and beyond the publics level of "need to know" information.
      If we truly want a politician to prove their self worth...why not focus on removing all of the luxuries and ammenities from our prison systems. Air conditioning, gyms, physical fitness courts, onsite doctors, dentists, mail services, banking services, etc..
      Why not have them address the abuse of our current welfare systems as opposed to wanting to remove government buildings which truly do serve a purpose for the hard working people.
  • ROBERT  •  Orlando, Florida  •  3 months ago
    the entire mid-east is falling. the united states better start providing its own fuel and industrial needs before it is too late, if it isn't already!
    • Dennis 3 months ago
      America needs to strike a balance with its own fuel so that everyone is comfortable with it.
    • Condor 3 months ago
      oh im sorry you see the world as countries and "its own " resources. the world is made up of the NWO and everyone else. countries dont mean #$%$ its us against them im afraid. and they are everywhere
    • Condor 3 months ago
      ur country doesnt want u to have cheap oil. then you can pollute the environment more. they want 90% of us gone. and its almost show time
  • punkslapper  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  3 months ago
    Another example of being in countries that don't want us there. Leave them alone and let them live the stone age life they've been living since their existence. If they decide to attack us, bomb them into oblivion. We need to get completely out of the middle east and not even do business with them at all. Let them rot. And the same goes for China too. If we don't buy their oil and their goods, then they won't have anything at all. We need to start making our own things again and drill for our own oil and develop alternative energy resources and leave the rest of the world to rot in it's own violence.
  • Agressive Avenging Angel  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  3 months ago
    So this is what democracy looks like in the Middle East! Not! The western world's unrealistic
    pipedream of "democratizing' the world will never happen, nor would it solve the major problems of this world!!! It would be great if we could the major problems of this nation
    and improve the quality of life for ALL Americans!!!
  • thomas c  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 months ago
    Get out of the Middle East forever!
  • motorcyclemadman  •  3 months ago
    Wonder how many tax dollars this embassy has cost us over the years? And for what?
    • Lib and Proud 3 months ago
      Let's see: Proving a conduit for communication between our governments, issuing VISAs, replacing passports, taking care of American travelers with problems; that's what.
  • Robert Storrie  •  3 months ago
    Screw the middle east. Pull all US citizens and troops out of the toilet and let the caveman kill each other.
  • BB  •  3 months ago
    Let someone else take care of the Middle East, the USA needs to stay out of there. Close our embassy were there are radical people.
  • A Man for FREEDOM  •  3 months ago
    It is very sad what is happening over there but it IS OVER THERE. It isn't America so it really isn't on us to say whos leader should fall or who should take their place. America has overthrown too many leader of other countries. It is not right. America is not the police force of the World. Nor should it be. We should be like we were before WW@ pretty much let the other people do their thing if they attack us we will get involved otherwise it's not our place to interfere. Now under the guise of Being the U.N's Big Gun we are pointed in the direction of every little revolt or skirmish. America should only get involved when absolutely necessary, and not a moment before.
  • Cyberxq  •  Portland, Oregon  •  3 months ago
    I'm glad they got out. A gal in one of my classes, who's from the Middle East, says that the neighboring countries (with similar customes and religious practices) should be the ones who help these countries in turmoil, not the U.S. No one appreciates Western ways and rejects our efforts to help. So, perhaps we should just stay out of foreign affairs where we're not needed or wanted. Let's provide for our own country's needs first.
  • Mr. RD  •  3 months ago
    Good!!! Leave and dont go back. Waste of my tax cash!!!
  • s1eep1ess  •  3 months ago
    our government needs to be worried about the USA more than other countries.. We have people out of jobs homeless people and millions of people with no healthcare and cant afford. Take care of the USA then worry about what other countries are doing.. They always put other countries before us its time they stop and start helping us here at home..
  • LewisSckolnick  •  Leverett, Massachusetts  •  3 months ago
    This only proves just how well the USA understands the countries of the Middle East.
  • concerned  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
    Let these countries fight it out. As they have done for thousands of years. Their mind set and culture are their business. I wish we'd put more energy into caring for our own country....our way of life and quit imposing ourselves on the world. If other countries want democracy, let them fight for it, just as our fore fathers did for each of us and then hang on to it tenaciously.
  • richard  •  Modesto, California  •  3 months ago
    There is no point in the US getting involved in Syria on any level. Why? Because these are Muslims. No matter which side we take ....including no side at all....they're going to hate us. If we help the syrian people overthrow their government...does anyone believe that we're going to gain an ally? NO, we're not. we're going to help create another Islamic state that hates the US. There is no winning move in the middle east as long as Islam exists as a political force.
  • George  •  Reseda, California  •  3 months ago
    Not our problem, stay out of Muslim affairs they have been doing this garbage for centuries ..we need to stop trying to change these people its not going to happen and it only makes us no better than them
  • fr8bil  •  3 months ago
    Syrian "exit Visas" for an accredited diplomat to leave a foreign Country ??? Since when do they need permission to "exit" ?
  • Richard  •  3 months ago
    Might as well get out of the entire Middle East and start investing in alternative energy or exploring our own oil reserves ..